1. Ive used it before.
Do you deserve a justified say in this discussion? If you've used an aimbot hack imo you're as bad as OP.
You toggle it
It looked as though he toggled it on to aim at one of us and/or had a button which, when pressed, aims him at the nearest player, so that he could turn it off.
either he made it or there is a polished version lying around somewhere that we do not know about.
Imo OP is too dumb to make his own aimbot but aside from that it didn't seem very smooth and finished.
3. Blockland's hitboxes are crap.
1. No. 2. It's not hard to view a rectangle. 3. I doubt it's hard to lock onto said rectangle.
Its really choppy and hard to play with
It was being used to target us while he could fire at us, and then it seemed it was "disabled" for exploration.
was a jerk, got banned.
I'll give you these.
Navaro blew it out of proportion.
If banning someone for using aimbot on a deathmatch server is "blowing it out of proportion," what would you do and/or what do you think is "in proportion?"
We end up here.
This started because of someone using an aimbot, me and Navaro reacting by banning him, and him posting this drama for protecting our server. It is as if it was Outpact's interior desire to drama Navaro and gain as just a position as possible.
Unless someone provides some actual proof of what the hell happened
If we have used 5 forum pages and there is not an explanation, do you think there will be in the future? We have already stated that we didn't do anything in the collection of proof because we didn't expect OP to go this far as to create this post. His best proof is taking a picture of his screen so it looks like his "friend" (himself) doesn't know how to take a screenshot, to ensure separation from his split personality.
both seem dumb to me.
If there is no explanation, how can either side be proven dumb?
