But the difference between the posts that Headcrab Zombie and SeventhSandwich make and most everyone else in this topic, is that they're backed up with sources from credible journals and meta-studies, done by credible expert doctors and professors, who all publish their findings and their work, so that other credible scientists can cross-examine it.
They're not debating their opinions, they're expressing the results that are supported by countless credible experts from across the globe.
This. Most of the things I've posted in this thread cite some form of credible source written by expert(s), or a source backing it up could very easily be found. To counter my claims is to indirectly argue against the experts.
If you want direct debating, it's not hard to find a video/transcript/some form of recording of debates between someone who has neither qualifications, nor experience in the field, and clearly has no idea what they're talking about, trying to directly debate with a evolutionary biologist about evolution, a climatologist about climate change, an immunologist about whether or not vaccines cause autism, etc. There are many people who think they know more than the experts.
Poll