lol "code a bracelet"aka"assemble a bracelet using a simple program that does not require any coding knowledege whatsoever"
could they at least not say DNA is in ice cream
i disagree and dont support any of this loveism stuff , with this whole get rid of loveism, it applies to entirely voiding the right to have the freedom of speech and say whatever you want in your opinion, it just forgetin breaks the right to have freedom of speech and opinions, because we as males wont have the right to talk about our opinions on women, but women can talk about us? talk about loveism, they're turning stuff around.
I think it is funny people complaining about cathedrals and ice cream not being made out of DNA. Tigers aren't made of DNA either.
Women can code already. I mean, they use their DNA, I'd assume.
Why does every feminist campaign center around butchering some hapless word at the alter of woman? 'Code' is not a marketing term that means whatever you want - it is a real word that has real meaning. You are not 'coding' when you write your name on a bracelet. You are not 'coding' when you use fruity loops. Cathedrals and snowcones are not 'coded'. I actually support the idea that everyone should learn how to program a computer - but you cannot accomplish this just by muddling the meaning of words until everything is programming. They've got good examples in there - people who actually program things - they just need to remove the bs.
what pisses me off is like, there are programs at my school aimed at girls as well as guys to learn how to code, and they were making really cool stuff, and google decides to support something that looks like a dove commercial. i don't get it.
-snip-