A (aloveual) isn't exactly something that requires support, I mean who hates aloveuals, being aroused by nothing should be inherently inoffensive
this is where you are wrong
First of all, I am not saying that aloveuals are oppressed by
law in anyway; however, the way society views them has negative effects that certainly merit them to be part of a minority group.
Aloveuals have absolutely no representation anywhere in the media, and that's the biggest issue. Usually, people brush us aside because we're "nothing." Why does not having any loveual attraction mean invalidation? I hate having to hear people say things like, "You'll grow out of it," or "There's someone out there you'll like," and it's not like gay people don't hear things like that. By adding A to a group for minorities in
loveuality and gender, you're giving us some form of a voice.
And it's not like we don't have to deal with the same emotional process as gays, biloveuals, and panloveuals. We still have to deal with "coming out." We still have to deal with feeling "wrong" and not being like everyone else. If you have the time, I highly suggest reading this
6-part article from the Huffington Post that I read a while back. It really explains the whole issue surrounding aloveuality better than I could have, mostly because I suck at explaining these sorts of things.
not to mention that homoromantics exists and they aren't gay because that requires loveual attraction
wow thirteen posts came before this i really spent a while to find that article huh
and i left a sentence fragment in there
11/10
