What's it matter if its a choice?
It matters because it's one of the reasons some people use to justify hatred towards it; it's a lot harder to justify hatred when the aspect you're hating can not be controlled at all.
Last I checked, in a free country, I can choose what I do as long as it doesn't adversely effect others or it isn't against the law...
In theory, yes. But the problem is that people who think it's a choice tend to be christians who insist it does adversely affect others and want it [at least marriage] to be against the law
That's not how science works. You can't just say "scientific consensus is you're wrong." The fact of the matter is there are a grand number of new things to discover, on our planet and elsewhere. A scientists doesn't tell someone they are wrong just for putting out an idea.
There's a difference between "putting out an idea" and "putting out an idea that contradicts very large amounts of research, with nothing to back up yours"
No, you don't need research to have this idea. But you do need it if you want anyone to take it seriously or give it any actual thought
which isn't a theory but rather a scientific law
A theory and a law are completely different things. Neither are "less true" than the other. A law states what happens, a theory explains
why that happens. There's both a law ("things fall") and a theory (explaining why and how it works) of gravity.
Oh by the way, who's fault is it that gay love is more dangerous? The patriarchy's?
The only reason gay love is "more dangerous" is because of people who go around loving random people they just met without protection. The same risk is present in heteroloveual love. Mutually monogamous relationships are just as safe as heteroloveual mutual monogamous relationships. The difference is that homoloveual men tend to be more promiscuous.
I'm not saying its wrong. I'm saying it could be wrong, which is true. I think you misunderstood me.
Yes it theoretically "could" (and using that word very loosely) be wrong, but with the amount of evidence on one side, and the amount of evidence on the other, it's extremely unlikely.
Also, you didn't say "it could be wrong" . you said
I feel like this is probably not true.
Like I told you privately, I think topics for argument and debate are good.
This. I don't get why there's such a huge stigma towards debate; if you don't want to participate, don't. Humanity wouldn't have advanced at all in social issues (or any issue, really) if real leaders frowned on debate as much as you guys do.
