T̶u̶m̶b̶l̶r̶ wofl Megathread

[Kimon²]

[Ad Bot]

[xxxxkill]

The Cory in the House only makes that video better.

[Kimon²]

imagine the reaction of the first person who found that, or somebody who found it unintentionally

[Foxscotch]

imagine the reaction of the first person who found that, or somebody who found it unintentionally

is there another possibility? like, are there people who just go through research videos, looking for the Cory in the House intro?

[Kimon²]

is there another possibility? like, are there people who just go through research videos, looking for the Cory in the House intro?

no i mean without being linked to it which i assume is what a lot of the views are from. idk i guess you're right

[Rockinboy2000]

WHAT IS IT


SOMEONE TELL ME

OH MY GOD IM DYING OF LAUGHTER

IM IN TEARS OH GOD

[Kimon²]

WHAT IS IT


SOMEONE TELL ME

a research video, completely normal, but at 4:20 the full corey in the house intro plays then immediately cuts back to the research

[Rockinboy2000]

a research video, completely normal, but at 4:20 the full corey in the house intro plays then immediately cuts back to the research

I JUST SAW

IM LITERALLY DYING

[devildogelite]

that's only because of some ridiculous thing they put in the constitution or whatever a long time ago. for no good reason
it doesn't change what justice is

Whoa whoa whoa hold the loving phone right now. Did you just seriously say double jeopardy is "some ridiculous thing put in the constitution for no good reason"? Jesus Christ

[Foxscotch]

Whoa whoa whoa hold the loving phone right now. Did you just seriously say double jeopardy is "some ridiculous thing put in the constitution for no good reason"? Jesus Christ

it doesn't even make sense
like if someone is supposedly proven to have not done something
but then definite proof arises that they did it
how is it not ridiculous that they can't then be punished for doing it?

if a guy cheats on me, but then he says he didn't and I believe him, but THEN it's proven that he did, I would without a doubt break up with him

[devildogelite]

it doesn't even make sense
like if someone is supposedly proven to have not done something
but then definite proof arises that they did it
how is it not ridiculous that they can't then be punished for doing it?

if a guy cheats on me, but then he says he didn't and I believe him, but THEN it's proven that he did, I would without a doubt break up with him

Do you honestly not get the concept of double jeopardy? The prosecutor should only charge and go to trial when they believe they have a case strong enough to win. Without double jeopardy they could just keep charging someone over and over anytime new evidence comes out. Courts also rarely if ever find someone innocent, they find them not guilty.

If you really don't understand the concept of why no double jeopardy is good I doubt you understand the purpose of a justice system that well.

[*FacePalm*]

there it is

[pefu19]

oh god

pls add my tumplr
kxait.tumblr.com
i just made it too

[Yosher]

well yeah, that's why racism against white people isn't a thing, or at least something that doesn't matter or that should overshadow  racism against everyone else

white people were the ones to push social darwinism. the racism they receive is, justified. you know, social justice.

thanks for reminding me once again why i shouldn't take you seriously in any situation ever

[Kimon²]

there is a difference between individualized racism, which everybody can experience, and institutionalized racism, which white people generally do not experience in the u.s.a so it's to only one sjw's acknowledge the existence of

also to everyone's url i havent added im sorry but im lazy ill do it now