Pretty sure in the DLC there's a female ward where you get attacked by women.
so victims and villains
yeah it's still not really positive but at least it's not devoid of women?? Not sure which is better tbh
I guess it's a lot more challenging to do in a survival horror game (where there's a sole, usually male, protagonist and most characters aren't going to survive other than the protagonist anyway), but Silent Hill (as in the first one) looked pretty good from what I saw in terms of female positive representation so it's probably possible. I haven't played it since I don't own a PS1 and i'm not big on horror games anyway. Maybe I'll watch an LP of both games.
>protagonist gets attacked by women
>loveist
It really depends on the context, and in this one, it's not misogynist because of that. You can really only say the game is misogynist because there's a lack of positive female characters.
there are no women because they thought people would be offended if women were murdered or acted agaisnt
seriously
i mean yeah this blog still would have whined but i wouldn't have agreed with them. Good writers know how to make a scenario where a woman gets attacked NOT misogynist.
>protagonist is never attacked by women, women are attacked by other things
>"videogames portray women as victims!"
>protagonist is attacked by women enemies
>"videogames portray women as shrill and evil!"
The biggest reason I can't take feminist media criticism seriously it is that you can conjure it out of /anything/. 100% of all media can be misinterpreted and misconstrued to be offensive and marginalizing to a specific group. Here, try me. Give me a name of a movie, book, or videogame and I will point out how an armchair activist can see it as loveist/tribal/etc in some way.
but you have to understand why they're criticizing it? I'm saying they're justified in calling it misogynist because the only women in the game are victims and villains and not even major characters. Yeah, they can be wrong or making a mountain of an anthole, but there are instances where it's absolutely justified.
The lack of a female villians is bothersome, perhaps this could provide some inspiration?
holy stuff that's misogynist
it's a movie literally about a guy being abused by women?? sounds like a lot of internalized fear to me
and,yes, I would have said that it was misandrist if it were genderbent.
Might I ask if this is a parody? Regardless, I'm glad most things have moved past this level. :K