I never stated anything happened four years ago, Zapk brought up the entire four year statement. Read thoroughly before you call out on something.
What kind of logic is that?
"I'm not a hypocrite because 4 years ago isn't in the past"
Please stop, you're talking without reading or thinking. If you actually read and comprehended what I was saying maybe you would understand, but you don't.
He himself first brought up the four years thing because he interpreted history as 'many years ago'.
You're also mad at me for something I did like four years ago?
As you can see, I never claimed once in this topic that I blamed him for something that happened many years ago. My anger was directed at his overall attitude towards people and how he has acted and treated others in the past.
I guess you're not quite bright enough to catch on when I try to be straight forward about it-- but that's your problem.
But isn't 4 years ago in the past?
I didn't clarify enough, I meant that history isn't a specific given amount of time. When someone says history it doesn't mean a vast amount of time ago, it simply means something that has already happened. The idea was to avoid a fixed length of time.
I don't know what else to add, but this should cover and confusions. I should've probably kept to myself ...