Author Topic: Five Nights at Freddy's 1 and 2 and also 3 I think  (Read 345726 times)

He said he knows nothing about Golden Freddy.
"Ah yes, let me tell the masses how I decided to put a secret in a video game."

"Ah yes, let me tell the masses how I decided to put a secret in a video game."
And the fact that the sequel took place in 1987 is supposed to be a plot twist at the end of the game. That's why it's revealed on the ending check and the newspaper behind it. If he just told everyone, then it wouldn't be a twist.

And the fact that the sequel took place in 1987 is supposed to be a plot twist at the end of the game. That's why it's revealed on the ending check and the newspaper behind it. If he just told everyone, then it wouldn't be a twist.
How is that relevant to the point that he probably didn't want to spoil an easter egg for those who never found it.

By stating "Golden Freddy? wtf is that?", anyone who hasn't found him before are going back to play the game to find out, or do the lazy thing and google it.

How is that relevant to the point that he probably didn't want to spoil an easter egg for those who never found it.

By stating "Golden Freddy? wtf is that?", anyone who hasn't found him before are going back to play the game to find out, or do the lazy thing and google it.
So what you're saying is that he lied to prevent spoiling an easter egg, but he wouldn't lie to prevent spoiling a plot twist?

So what you're saying is that he lied to prevent spoiling an easter egg, but he wouldn't lie to prevent spoiling a plot twist?
i sure that he lied to scare people, knowing theres something in their game that does this and the creator didnt make him.

So what you're saying is that he lied to prevent spoiling an easter egg
yes

but he wouldn't lie to prevent spoiling a plot twist?
what the forget are you talking about?
you keep putting words in peoples mouth like some sort of park child enthusiast's rooster.

I know that he didn't want to spoil an easter egg and all, but he could have just said
nothing

yes
what the forget are you talking about?
you keep putting words in peoples mouth like some sort of park child enthusiast's rooster.
The plot twist I'm referring to is the date on the check. The check is only seen at the end of the game, and they reveal that the game took place in 1987.
« Last Edit: November 12, 2014, 04:56:41 PM by blueblur121 »

The plot twist I'm referring to is the date on the check, and the newspaper in the check's background.
How the forget is that relevant to golden loving freddy.

I know that he didn't want to spoil an easter egg and all, but he could have just said
nothing
but then people would know something's up

guys im gonna do night 3 and i refuse to accept fnaf 2 is a prequel
that's how you can deny it
refuse to accept that it is a prequel

How the forget is that relevant to golden loving freddy.
What are you even talking about? I thought you were implying that Scott lied about Golden Freddy, but not about FNAF 2 taking place after FNAF 1. I thought that because you were continuing a conversation that was about FNAF 2 being a prequel.

What are you even talking about? I thought you were implying that Scott lied about Golden Freddy, but not about FNAF 2 taking place after FNAF 1.
goldie is really wierd tho
like his head just floats around

anyways, goldie in fnaf1:

goldie in fnaf2:

I thought that because you were continuing a conversation that was about FNAF 2 being a prequel.
Stop thinking with your ass.
I never continued on. It wasn't even implied in any sort. Quite frankly I would rather not continue with that discussion because it's not really worth discussing anything intelligently when the other person just put their fingers in their ears and say "LALALALA" when they're not hearing what they want.

implying
You're trying to read between lines when there is nothing to read. Quit thinking people are implying stuff when the discussion isn't even implicit about an irrelevant subject.

Stop thinking with your ass.
I never continued on. It wasn't even implied in any sort. Quite frankly I would rather not continue with that discussion because it's not really worth discussing anything intelligently when the other person just put their fingers in their ears and say "LALALALA" when they're not hearing what they want.
You're trying to read between lines when there is nothing to read. Quit thinking people are implying stuff when the discussion isn't even implicit about an irrelevant subject.
is this part right here about me?
i mean i'm just asking
not offended or anything