Poll

One or the other, really

its okay to be gay
136 (76.4%)
its not okay to be gay
42 (23.6%)

Total Members Voted: 178

Author Topic: What do you think about gays?  (Read 22529 times)

It has been an honor serving with you, the BLF.  

well consider this.
while some people always consider their own priorities first, it's only their interests they're protecting, and if there's enough, it's basically the most popular issues.
This is why the American system is broke. It's not quite like this in other democracies.
We have two parties, which really only stress their differences on a few different points each election.
Were it not like this, you could let people advocate for their rights (if they didn't have them already) while still being allowed to focus on other issues. I mean right now if you want to advocate/vote for Gay Rights you're going to be in the democratic party if you want to make a difference. And that means that both:
1. You have to accept their values in unrelated areas.
2. They have to take a chunk of unrelated party members time to work on these issues.
if people didn't aggressively go after their own issues, no one would. the system basically acts like basically making sure the most contended topic is the one dealt with.
I think there's enough momentum that eventually most of the states will legalize same-love marriage. The problem is that "having it legallized eventually" just isn't good enough. Sure it's always been illegal, for the 250 or so years this countries been around, but now, now it's the single most important issue, despite high unemployment rates, inflation, a healthcare system that was implemented badly.
as it stands, far more people consider the economic issues above social justice issues, but they're just not as vocal and up front about it.
to clarify: if everyone was as selfish as possible about their own issues, in a way, it'd work out perfectly since the largest issues would satisfy the most people.
I don't think it's far more people though. I think it's basically white men who have the burden of caring about the economy and government outside of this handful of issues.
I'll have to find where I read this, but about %40 of women consider abortion to be the single most important issue.
Of LGBT people their issues are far more likely to place first.

The "everyone being selfish" thing doesn't work in a representative democracy though. Especially a bipartisan one like ours. It might work in a pure democracy, but in one as inefficient as ours you have to make choices, priorities and sacrifices.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2014, 11:51:45 AM by DrenDran »

2) you will most certainly end up hating me if I keep going.  
"I dont want you guys to hate me"

I wonder how long it will take you idiots to realize that I'm having lots of fun getting you worked up. 

Except you Reciful. 

"haha ur all idiots ive been trolling all along"


eh, yeah
also the momentum was invisible to me since i'm running on a theme :p

....do you have any idea how many more things take precedent over the well-being of 3% of the population? like 100% of the population, which would be matters of grand scale like the global economy?

Oh well let's take Black people in the 50's and 60's. Only about 11%. It's not 100% so their rights shouldn't have mattered correct?

-content removed because it was irrational and stupid-

Lol, you really think you can get yourself out of this one now?

Oh well let's take Black people in the 50's and 60's. Only about 11%. It's not 100% so their rights shouldn't have mattered correct?
He's saying how it was, not how it should be.
If you wanna argue with someone about that argue with me.

eh, yeah
>tfw no response

also the momentum was invisible to me since i'm running on a theme :p
i'm sure mom will be happy to hear that

Lol, you really think you can get yourself out of this one now?



YOU THINK THIS IS A GAME?

He's saying how it was, not how it should be.
If you wanna argue with someone about that argue with me.
Dem rhymes.

Oh well let's take Black people in the 50's and 60's. Only about 11%. It's not 100% so their rights shouldn't have mattered correct?
loving hell, it's not about if they mattered or not. back then, they were approximately the only loving issue at all. the economy was still hugely surging, there was global peace for a while, they figured hell, let's do this civil rights thing. as it stands, we're swamped in many other issues and social justice just cannot manage to be at the forefront.

I wonder how long it will take you idiots to realize that I'm having lots of fun getting you work up.

Except you Reciful.
looks like i found something under the bridge of homoloveuality

He's saying how it was, not how it should be.
If you wanna argue with someone about that argue with me.
>tfw no response
i'm sure mom will be happy to hear that

Then let's stalk about economic problems. You think that can be solved quicker than the homoloveual rights problem? That's another problem I have is people that think issues on the national scale can be solved immediately. We've had deep stuff economic problems for at least a decade, what makes you think that the stoppage of recent uprising of gay rights could solve our economic problem faster? It's better to just pick away at the problems that can be easily solved. You said it yourself, there's momentum for legalization of gay marriage in states. But you shouldn't say that it isn't a problem that doesn't deserve to be at the forefront, when the economic problem has had its chance many many many times before. While politicians are squabbling about how to approach this issue for the thousandth time, gays are getting rights to marry in more and more states.

hating people because they're gay just makes you look like a friend

ehuehue

I should have just said "Gays are loud and annoying in Massachusetts" and left