Nobot, you are just lowering yourself to petty insults and grasping straws for anything to chuck in my general direction.
Petty insults? Lol. I didn't directly insult you or anything, I responded to what you said.
There not being a feature to turn off auto-updating is a significant issue and more developer and advanced user tools are a good thing.
Again, saying that Chrome is bad for that is like saying a car is bad for no cup-holders.
They can easily implement it but nobody cares enough to.
The perfect example to prove my point of you grasping straws for insults. That was in no way directed any way towards you, but you obviously are trying to wrap everything around yourself, to stir up stuff, where there is nothing to stir up.
Weren't you the one trying to 'prove' how Chrome is bad from personal experiences? Seems like
you are trying to wrap things around yourself. Comparing chrome to experiences you don't even know are accurate.
I was bringing out very valid points of Chrome not having a feature to disable auto-updating and that Firefox has many more options for advanced users and you attempted to twist them around to be meant as insults towards yourself and belittling valid arguments you can't argue in any sensible way. If you're feeling that insignificant, please talk to your parents about it and don't come arguing online.
Basically what I am trying to say because I'm guessing you don't get it by now:
If you dislike Chrome for a few simple features that easily could be implemented but don't, It doesn't necessarily make the service bad. You're being too biased based from personal experiences with Chrome. I've used Firefox too, and anybody can come in and say how Firefox is bad because Chrome has uniqueness as well compared to it.
"If you're feeling that insignificant, please talk to your parents about it and don't come arguing online." I like how you say I use petty insults when I've never even said anything remotely as petty as this ^
Poll