Any man with common sense could see that Jaxx is innocent. After all, all of the clues left at the crime scene thus far point to hodot: the strange curly item left at camel's death as well as the comic left at the scene. I'm sure that we are all aware that hodot possesses curly hair, which would explain the curly object left behind (it is entirely possible that he lost a piece or two of hair in the struggle for dear camel's life.) It is also known that hodot is responsible for the BROCKRAND comics, which would easily explain the comic book that was also left behind.
Jaxx, to the best of our knowledge, does not have curly hair. He also is not known for running a comic series. Therefore, he could not have left either piece of evidence at the crime scene if he truly were the killer. Clearly, then, it can be said that hodot is guilty of the murder of camel (and possibly more) whereas Jaxx is innocent. It was foolish to accuse him in the first place.