Author Topic: "Poll: Should officer Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown, be arrested?"  (Read 69319 times)

Might as well lock this thread permanently before you dig yourself all the way to the earth's core.

still not relevant at all to the post except a little bit the very last part of it
maybe?
therefore it isn't "entirely irrelevant"

It's not really chaos in here, almost everyone seems to be in agreement that you're wrong.
keep your conspiracy to tumblr please kimon
Might as well lock this thread permanently before you dig yourself all the way to the earth's core.
notice how i predicted everybody would ignore the evidence again
therefore it isn't "entirely irrelevant"
would "hardly relevant" be better



Which documents do these cite? I don't see them in that big post, nor have I seen them in any post.

I'm just curious whether or not these were claims made by you, or by the doctors/investigators themselves.
the injuries were pre-existing, or the injuries were caused by a different event that darren wilson did not mention.
This is somewhat of a redundant statement. They're more-or-less the same thing. Unless I'm misreading your intended definition.

this last piece mike brown hit darren wilson with a left hook that caused no head trauma
I will have to agree with Alyx that not all bruises are huge black welts as seen in movies. It is very possible that the red blemishes are in fact bruises. I bruise in a similar manner, albeit that's user when I fall down, and hurt my legs.

However, who knows. Maybe Brown was stuff at throwing punches.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2014, 11:18:59 PM by Jubel »


notice how you are throwing this petty argument out of proportion like tenfold

theres no point in arguing like this just lock the thread damnit

you are worse than jairo at this point camel
kimon, you locked a thread so you could make a post.

that's like throwing a flashbang inside a debate hall and writing an argument while everyone is reeling

still not relevant at all to the post except a little bit the very last part of it
maybe?you are worse than jairo at this point camel
He wasn't posting it to be relevenat though.

And you're right. You stopped all discussion by locking the topic.

notice how i predicted everybody would ignore the evidence again

Sidestep #349

We must go deeper



Which documents do these cite? I don't see them in that big post, nor have I seen them in any post.

I'm just curious whether or not these were claims made by you, or by the doctors/investigators themselves.This is somewhat of a redundant statement. They're more-or-less the same thing. Unless I'm misreading your intended definition.
I will have to agree with Alyx that not all bruises are huge black welts as seen in movies. It is very possible that the red blemishes are in fact bruises. I bruise in a similar manner, albeit that's user when I fall down, and hurt my legs.

However, who knows. Maybe Brown was stuff at throwing punches as well.
clearly the image of the document broke for you
kimon, you locked a thread so you could make a post.

that's like throwing a flashbang inside a debate hall and writing an argument while everyone is reeling
there was no debate going on, it had devolved into absolute garbage at the point i decided i needed to give the thread a breather

kimon no ones responding to your "evidence" because we all( the presumed majority) disagree with you

at this point your one of those naked dudes on the street with the "end is nigh" signs.



lol "breather"


there was no debate going on, it had devolved into absolute garbage at the point i decided i needed to give the thread a breather
tbh I think you should leave the news topics to other people

case in point

clearly the image of the document broke for youthere was no debate going on, it had devolved into absolute garbage at the point i decided i needed to give the thread a breather
in your opinion in was garbage, because it wasn't what you wanted to hear



Congratulations detective Kimon, using your superb evidence and research, we have concluded that Michael Brown, was in-fact, shot.

clearly the image of the document broke for you


Neither of these two records have anything pertaining to the direct quotes shown in the other 2 puush links.

All I am is curious if I missed something. There's no need for sass. I'm not trying to antagonize you.