at this point i think this discussion is just a waiting game for definite evidence
I don't see why you
wouldn't wait for definite evidence before you try to
trial someone for murderWtf even
a.k.a. cherry picking
Nope, you don't know what this means. What I removed was irrelevant to the point I was making. You can't just fill up your posts with tons of irrelevant passive aggressive sarcastic garbage and then cry foul when someone bypasses it.
did you read my post? (no) because i did in fact mention both sides of the story with every single piece of evidence i brought up
You have piled up tons of neutral evidence and accompanied them with your bias loaded pet theories. This is conjecture, this does not constitute legitimate proof.