"Poll: Should officer Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown, be arrested?"

[Rally]

i cannot obtain evidence

Neither can the Grand Jury. Which is why he wasn't indicted.

[Ad Bot]

[Jubel]

i cannot obtain evidence that these doctors did or did not give darren wilson painkillers and tell him to leave without explaining whether or not he had injuries, but common sense seems to say "yes"

Then it also goes without saying that the members of the grand jury are professionals themselves, correct? I mean, it's only common sense. That's why they were put onto the case in the first place.

[Gumba Jonny]

"Pretty sure" should honestly only be reserved for people whose balls have been sweetened with the roux of professional law enforcement things. I'd trust their assumptions over any pangendered jabroni investigator.

[SeventhSandwich]

Then it also goes without saying that the members of the grand jury are professionals themselves, correct? I mean, it's only common sense. That's why they were put onto the case in the first place.

Uh no, jurors are selected like any other kind of trial jury.

http://campus.udayton.edu/~grandjur/faq/faq2.htm

[Badger]

i really dont know why you think you are that important to me

who said that?

because I really don't

[Jubel]

Uh no, jurors are selected like any other kind of trial jury.

http://campus.udayton.edu/~grandjur/faq/faq2.htm

Thank you. At least someone here has the ability to cite to support their claims.

[Jaxx]

Uh no, jurors are selected like any other kind of trial jury.

http://campus.udayton.edu/~grandjur/faq/faq2.htm

[Kimon²]

Then it also goes without saying that the members of the grand jury are professionals themselves, correct? I mean, it's only common sense. That's why they were put onto the case in the first place.

how did you come to that conclusion? you realize that jury members are mostly just average citizens, right?

Neither can the Grand Jury. Which is why he wasn't indicted.

cherry-picking parts of my argument and using them for a different context seems like bullstuff to me

Thank you. At least someone here has the ability to cite to support their claims.

well excuse me for getting held back by "    
Warning - while you (etc.)"
every damn time i try to post

[Rally]

cherry-picking parts of my argument and using them for a different context seems like bullstuff to me

You've got a lot of balls to talk about 'cherry-picking'.

[Jairo]

cherry-picking parts of my argument and using them for a different context seems like bullstuff to me

is this happening right now

is the pot calling the kettle black?

[Kochieboy]

i cannot obtain evidence

[Jubel]

how did you come to that conclusion? you realize that jury members are just average citizens, right?

I was actually not aware how that works in the States. Being from another country. I legitimately thought it would've compromised of people who are familiar with a lot more court cases than a normal citizen, but thanks to SS linking me with a reliable resource, I was indeed wrong.

excuse me for getting held back by "    
Warning - while you (etc.)"
every damn time i try to post

That isn't really relevant. Moreso, you still failed to cite a proper resource in the above quote, which could've left me to believe it was all personal conjecture, if a proper document wasn't supplied stating otherwise.

[Kimon²]

where the hell have i been cherry picking to the extent that rally did with that post

I was actually not aware how that works in the States. Being from another country. I legitimately thought it would've compromised of people who are familiar with a lot more court cases than a normal citizen, but thanks to SS linking me with a reliable resource, I was indeed wrong.
That isn't really relevant. Moreso, you still failed to cite a proper resource in the above quote, which could've left me to believe it was all personal conjecture, if a proper document wasn't supplied stating otherwise.

i could have found you a source if you didnt believe me, i was just under the impression that you had knowledge of this beforehand

[Rally]

I wasn't cherry-picking friend, I relieved your post of the unnecessary filler to point out the major flaw in your logic.

You haven't addressed the opposing interpretation at all. You're picking out stuffty bias images from Tumblr. All your evidence and conjecture comes from the same stuffty bias outlet.

[Kimon²]

at this point i think this discussion is just a waiting game for definite evidence

I wasn't cherry-picking friend, I relieved your post of the unnecessary filler to point out the major flaw in your logic.

a.k.a. cherry picking

You haven't addressed the opposing interpretation at all. You're picking out stuffty bias images from Tumblr. All your evidence and conjecture comes from the same stuffty bias outlet.

did you read my post? (no) because i did in fact mention both sides of the story with every single piece of evidence i brought up