"Poll: Should officer Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown, be arrested?"

[Rally]

yeah i guess that's reasonable, but i still dont think we should give up on trying to indict him, because there definitely is some evidence. there are usually a couple of cases that start out with no damning evidence that the killer is guilty, but there is evidence that usually leads to more evidence.

I don't disagree with further attempts to indict him. I'd love to see the case closed, guilty or not guilty.
This is the point I'm making, trying to make decisions for the Grand Jury based on the media's interpretation of the neutral evidence only leads to senseless rioting.

[Ad Bot]

[Kimon²]

if that's true then why are you so dead set on proving that it was murder, if you yourself do not know

because there is (minor, i guess) existing evidence that leads me to believe that the situation played out differently that what darren wilson said. me personally.

itt: kimon grabs random images and "evidence" off tumblr and says "HA! CHECKMATE!" instead of thinking about what happened on his own and making a rational thought. also making random insults and replying only to the parts of posts that are convenient to him i.e the parts that dont pertain to the case or the evidence provided

alright, what the hell makes darren wilson's medical report just some random tumblr image and not evidence

All the evidence supplied so far seems to be completely neutral, and can be contested by conjecture from both sides. It's not enough to send someone to trial on.

again, i guess it would probably just be a waiting game to see more decisive evidence then. which i personally hope will arise in the favor of mike brown because i don't trust darren wilson. based on him including false information in his testimony. again whether this was his fault or not is up to debate but i think it's suspicious.

[Jubel]

My personal view is that if an average citizen shot someone without self-defense being painfully evident, they'd get sent to trial immediately. Maybe not convicted, but at least tried for murder or homicide.

I would have to agree with you on that as well.

One thing I do appreciate Kimon doing however, is that he isn't picking "evidence" off tumblr feminist articles that cherrypicked their evidence to begin with. A lot of the rebuttal asks and statements on that website are completely baffling, as they only pick the one sentence that supports them from some pro-movement blog. It's surprising how little these people want to put forward to educate themselves and try to visualize the whole picture instead of visualizing one sentence.

[Georges]

Kimon;
http://youtu.be/L0MK7qz13bU

[Kimon²]

I would have to agree with you on that as well.

One thing I do appreciate Kimon doing however, is that he isn't picking "evidence" off tumblr feminist articles that cherrypicked their evidence to begin with. A lot of the rebuttal asks and statements on that website are completely baffling, as they only pick the one sentence that supports them from some pro-movement blog. It's surprising how little these people want to put forward to educate themselves and try to visualize the whole picture instead of visualizing one sentence.

i dont know if you've been seeing this, but there is literally a terrifying, hivemind-like general consensus on tumblr that is spreading false information and somewhat credible information at the speed of light, and i think i mentioned this, but also witch hunts to attack blogs who dont support or are neutral on the situation

Kimon;
http://youtu.be/L0MK7qz13bU

there's a reason im not replying to many other people besides jubel and rally

this would be one of those reasons

[Alternat¡ve]

Kimon;
http://youtu.be/L0MK7qz13bU

this.

its ok to admit when you're wrong, y'know?

[Jubel]

i dont know if you've been seeing this, but there is literally a terrifying, hivemind-like general consensus on tumblr that is spreading false information and somewhat credible information at the speed of light, and i think i mentioned this, but witch hunts to attack blogs who dont support or are neutral on the situation

Considering I'm only a small blog which only exists to follow a bunch of weird Japanese artists, the amount of stuff I'm seeing on this issue which is completely fabricated to every corner of the word is absolutely slambabblingly scary.

its ok to admit when you're wrong, y'know?

I would have to agree with this, since I had to admit it myself :P

[Kimon²]

i think the treatment of protestors is also going a little too far if you ask me. for example: tear gassing them and bringing in military vehicles.

[Jubel]

i think the treatment of protestors is also going a little too far if you ask me. for example: tear gassing them and bringing in military vehicles.

If they're blocking infrastructure, it seems like a necessary evil.
They all have the ability to protest peacefully from the sidewalk without causing any problems.

[Maxwell.]

[   width=700]https://33.media.tumblr.com/e3d0ebbd71a435d3a2efe6b1340ee3bb/tumblr_nfmuydn3b01so1pq6o1_1280.png[/img]
i think the treatment of protestors is also going a little too far if you ask me. for example: tear gassing them and bringing in military vehicles.

they were violent earlier though, weren't they?

[Alyx Vance]

i think the treatment of protestors is also going a little too far if you ask me. for example: tear gassing them and bringing in military vehicles.

They gassed them and brought in the big vehicles when they were, oh, you know, burning down the town?

[Kimon²]

i'm not beyond admitting im wrong, it's just that nobody is actually proven to be wrong yet. again the whole no definite evidence thing.

If they're blocking infrastructure, it seems like a necessary evil.
They all have the ability to protest peacefully from the sidewalk without causing any problems.

i honestly have to agree with this, mainly because there are plans to stop the macy's thanksgiving day parade. i think the protestors all agree they are doing it because they believe their protest is way more important. but it's like that pikachu baloon didnt do anything to you dont take it out on them

they were violent earlier though, weren't they?

They gassed them and brought in the big vehicles when they were, oh, you know, burning down the town?

there's a line that is becoming harder and harder to find between looters and protesters, but there are definitely a lot of good protestors out there. but anger is really powerful in large groups.

[Alyx Vance]

there's a line that is becoming harder and harder to find between looters and protesters, but there are definitely a lot of good protestors out there. but anger is really powerful in large groups.

Are you saying that its okay to burn down a town in anger?

[Ipquarx]

Are you saying that its okay to burn down a town in anger?

That is most definitely not what he's saying.

[Kimon²]

Are you saying that its okay to burn down a town in anger?

no