"Poll: Should officer Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown, be arrested?"

[Kimon²]

I still don't get why you're even bothering to argue this anymore.

What are you trying to accomplish?

The whole purpose behind whatever anyone believes is that such an incident should not happen again and both sides should take precautions to prevent it.

I don't see what anyone has to argue about. What's done is done.

just because darrel didnt get indicted doesnt mean we still cant try to get him arrested again. maybe when even more evidence arises.

[Ad Bot]

[Alyx Vance]

you keep ignoring that what i've been saying is a single  bruise is not enough proof to say with certainty that mike brown attacked the officer. that clearly hasnt stopped you, though.

Clearly the fact that there was multiple marks hasn't crossed your mind yet. And that the bruise thats obvious is pretty damn big.

It doesn't take much to prove an assault, lets say you got punched but only had one bruise. Would you like it if people said "Oh, he's bullstuffting to cover his ass"

just because darrel didnt get indicted doesnt mean we still cant try to get him arrested again. maybe when even more evidence arises.

Yes it does, sixth amendment. No double jeopardy.

[XR-7]

just because darrel didnt get indicted doesnt mean we still cant try to get him arrested again. maybe when even more evidence arises.

Okay.

When the evidence comes up, we'll put you on the case.

[Kimon²]

Clearly the fact that there was multiple marks hasn't crossed your mind yet. And that the bruise thats obvious is pretty damn big.

It doesn't take much to prove an assault, lets say you got punched but only had one bruise. Would you like it if people said "Oh, he's bullstuffting to cover his ass"

there was the bruise, considered evidence, the gash on the back of his neck, not considered evidence because it was most likely there before, and the small scrathes on his neck, which im not sure about but i dont consider evidence.

Yes it does, sixth amendment. No double jeopardy.

you
you realize darren wilson wasnt tried, right? that's what no indictment means.

[Alyx Vance]

there was the bruise, considered evidence, the gash on the back of his neck, not considered evidence because it was most likely there before, and the small scrathes on his neck, which im not sure about but i dont consider evidence.you
you realize darren wilson wasnt tried, right? that's what no indictment means.

Well, even if the other marks weren't considered evidence there is still the one that was. Do you think he should be bleeding from it before being considered good evidence?

He was in front of a jury, he was tried. He can't be tried again because he was found innocent, UNLESS he is proven to have lied in front of the judge and everyone in that courtroom.

[Kimon²]

Well, even if the other marks weren't considered evidence there is still the one that was. Do you think he should be bleeding from it before being considered good evidence?

He was in front of a jury, he was tried. He can't be tried again because he was found innocent, UNLESS he is proven to have lied in front of the judge and everyone in that courtroom.

he was not found innocent, they didnt indict him THEY DIDNT PUT HIM ON TRIAL

holy stuff dude

[Alyx Vance]

he was not found innocent, they didnt indict him THEY DIDNT PUT HIM ON TRIAL

holy stuff dude

I heard he had a private one, a private trial by Jury.

[Kimon²]

I heard he had a private one, a private trial by Jury.

???

well you heard wrong

[Rally]

I don't understand what the forget you're trying to do Kimon. The Grand Jury of the United States has the actual proof, and a team of people trained to interpret it. You're collecting bias stuff off tumblr from people who hate white cops. Just loving drop it dude, grab a beer and get on with your life, Jesus. What are you trying to do? Start a riot? Take a trip to MO and burn down a black man's store and shoot a firefighter if it makes you feel better or something. This is ridiculous.

You really think that this was the work of the greater evil Caucasian machine? Do you want a tinfoil hat with that?

[Georges]

Do you want a tinfoil hat with that?

I have one I made for a costume  if you want it, Kimon

[Kimon²]

I don't understand what the forget you're trying to do Kimon. The Grand Jury of the United States has the actual proof, and a team of people trained to interpret it. You're collecting bias stuff off tumblr from people who hate white cops. Just loving drop it dude, grab a beer and get on with your life, Jesus. What are you trying to do? Start a riot? Take a trip to MO and burn down a black man's store and shoot a firefighter if it makes you feel better or something. This is ridiculous.

You really think that this was the work of the greater evil Caucasian machine? Do you want a tinfoil hat with that?

so are you just gonna start making stupid claims with no proof while ignoring everything to the contrary (along with countless logical fallacies) from here on out, or?

[Flame]

you're wrong. no indictment means there wasn't enough proof against him to send him to trial. he was not tried in front of a jury, he was never found innocent, and there is not enough incriminating proof to send him to court, apparently.

which is bullstuff. i still stand by my belief that mike brown had to have done something to antagonize wilson--nor was he innocent or shot for forgetin jaywalking--but he should have gone to court. there was no private jury, but kimon's right, he was not put on trial. god damn you guys you all sound like bafoons. he CAN go to court again because he was NOT indicted. the reason why there was no indictment was there was a large doubt (and still is) that wilson murdered brown out of cold blood.

there is not enough proof to prove wilson guilty.

there is not enough proof to prove wilson innocent.

therefore, wilson is not going on trial, nor was he on trial. that's literally what no indictment loving means. double jeopardy does not apply here because he was never held on trial. most likely he will be tried in the future, but if he was put on trial now, he'd be declared innocent. innocent until proven guilty--and there's not enough proof to declare him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. therefore, no indictment. if anything, it gives more time for more evidence to be found against him, but people act like it's the end of the world and start setting police cruisers on fire like a bunch of nimrods

[Rally]

so are you just gonna start making stupid claims with no proof while ignoring everything to the contrary (along with countless logical fallacies) from here on out, or?

I haven't done any of these things. What are you even implying.
I half expected this reaction, man to man, loving relax.

[Kimon²]

I haven't done any of these things. What are you even implying.
I half expected this reaction, man to man, loving relax.

yeah you have no clue what you're talking about

[Rally]

I'm not even making an argument, I'm ''talking'' about my opinion. Jesus christ lol, what the forget is your malfunction?