Author Topic: "Poll: Should officer Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown, be arrested?"  (Read 69480 times)

Like all media, everything should be taken with a grain of salt unless it can consistently be cited as viable information.
and if the social media sites completely valid evidence that you guys conveniently pretend doesnt exist?
Ladies and gentlemen, on the behalf of the court we wish to confirm this man as mentally disabled.
do you even realize how loving lazy your arguments are getting at this point?
having the entire thread against one person doesnt excuse you from having no argument whatsoever. cough rally cough

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
what kind of complex do you need to have to think that you are more skilled at law than people who actually went to college and stuff
step off your conspiracy horse, you're like 14 or some stuff. you don't know what happened any more than the forgettards you keep on citing as evidence do

do you even realize how loving lazy your arguments are getting at this point?
having the entire thread against one person doesnt excuse you from having no argument whatsoever.
i don't think he's even arguing, he might just be sayin that to make you mad lol

and if the social media sites completely valid evidence that you guys conveniently pretend doesnt exist
If there are significant variances on data from case to case to case, along with the influence of personal bias, it doesn't really count as viable information.

I am guilty of this myself, but I haven't seen you cite any reliable sources in all your claims. The influence of personal bias nulls most "evidence" people claim to have, unless it can be backed up by unbiased sources.

a jury of random people and people getting paid to defend that man are more credible than facts, medical experts, and countless photos on social media

Yet these people have access to 10x more legitimate evidence than you do. These people are the ones who actually go to the crime scene and interview the witnesses. These are the people that actually go look at the autopsy photos, the forensic evidence, ect. These are the people who actually do the loving math, and not just relay images from bias news outlets.

i know you guys all love to be friends and yell the old "lol tumblr is loving stupid!" rhetoric constantly but social media can be more reliable than some news sites at this point

Social media news outlets and internet news outlets basically come from the same place. The news you find on tumblr is basically bias cherry-picked recycled garbage from some of the most bias websites on the planet. You really think any of those people on social media actually went out and did any research? No, they're loving bottom feeders, like you, who go troll the internet for data that confirms their bias.

do you even realize how loving lazy your arguments are getting at this point?
having the entire thread against one person doesnt excuse you from having no argument whatsoever. cough rally cough

My argument is that you have no legitimate argument. I don't take a side on the Darren Wilson case, but I take a strong side on the "Kimon is being a loving moron" case.

do you even realize how loving lazy your arguments are getting at this point?
having the entire thread against one person doesnt excuse you from having no argument whatsoever. cough rally cough

Why bother trying to actually waste any energy to get over how dense you are. You don't listen to reason, you overlook valid evidence, you only rely on tumblr for your news. Gee I wonder why you would resort to petty insults to get cheap points, maybe it's because your just another tumblr sjw.

what kind of complex do you need to have to think that you are more skilled at law than people who actually went to college and stuff
step off your conspiracy horse, you're like 14 or some stuff. you don't know what happened any more than the forgettards you keep on citing as evidence do
so basically, you believe a lawyer paid to defend darren wilson is infinitely more credible than medical reports and autopsies?

do you not see a problem with that

so basically, you believe a lawyer paid to defend darren wilson is infinitely more credible than medical reports and autopsies?

do you not see a problem with that
Where are you getting this? Are we denying that he pulled the trigger or something?

so basically, you believe a lawyer paid to defend darren wilson is infinitely more credible than medical reports and autopsies?

do you not see a problem with that
please link me to the full, complete records and photographic data from the autopsy and medical reports then
you clearly have them, of course?

so basically, you believe a lawyer paid to defend darren wilson is infinitely more credible than medical reports and autopsies?
A lawyer isn't supposed to be credible evidence.
A lawyer is supposed to convince others that the evidence isn't relevant to the alleged crimes the defendant committed.

They're professional liars.

holy stuff you guys are saying that im overlooking your evidence, which absolutely none of you have posted, while simultaneously ignoring the actual, official evidence i am posting Jesus H. Christ
please link me to the full, complete records and photographic data from the autopsy and medical reports then
you clearly have them, of course?
holy stuff how many times do i have to link it before you guys stop ignoring them

i'll get them hold on

« Last Edit: November 26, 2014, 11:06:41 PM by Kimon² »


this, paired with darren wilson not knowing about the robbery when he got there (he stopped mike for jaywalking) pretty much eliminates the possibility that darren wilson was trying to take down some store-robbing menace by shooting him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWUkBxmFUvU
basically, this leaves two possibilities from what I can tell: mike brown stopped, turned around and supposedly raised his hands, but darren wilson continued shooting. these final shots lead to the final killing blows to his head. the other possibility is that after being shot multiple times, mike brown started running. however, he then apparently turned around and ran at the officer headfirst (low enough to be shorter than darren wilson and his gun.)



this last piece again leaves only a couple options: mike brown hit darren wilson with a left hook that caused no head trauma, the injuries were pre-existing, or the injuries were caused by a different event that darren wilson did not mention.
please try to control yourselves and take time to read this before you guys start posting again for christs sake its chaos in here half the time

tbh I think you should leave the news topics to other people

tbh I think you should leave the news topics to other people
immediately contributing nothing