how come loveual images of children are illegal but not pictures of dead children

[Aoki²]

not really sure

[Ad Bot]

[sir dooble]

loveual imagery/research of children promotes further production of that material, and thereby promotes loveual abuse of children. That is illegal. Therefore child research is illegal.

Doomonkey is completely correct.
Pictures of dead children don't support an industry which kills children. Therefore the images aren't illegal.
Pictures of dead children appear in Newspapers and on TV too. For the exact same reason it's not illegal there. No one is killing children solely to profit.

[Jaxx]

op's already growing up to be a child enthusiast, great.

[Blockaium]

op's already growing up to be a child enthusiast, great.

gee

people are missing the point

im not saying cp should be legal at all, im just saying, once again, you'd expect it from knowing most people that they would either make it one or the other. so no, im not being all like "IF CHILD GORE IS LEGAL, THE research SHOULD BE TOO", which i think is what some people are thinking out of this.

[Destroyer]

but sometimes just browsing google images you can come across a picture of a dead child even with their head halfway off or with stab wounds

I feel like this hasn't happened to a majority of people...

[Car Selling Pyro]

it's a sad reality for steve

[sir dooble]

I feel like this hasn't happened to a majority of people...

Yeah, actually. I'm surprised I didn't ponder this a little bit more.
The worst I ever see when browsing Google Images is maybe some ugly disease or something researchographic.

What are you google searching, Blockaium, that you're getting pictures of mutilated child corpses?

[jtizzle]

because if a person looks at an image rendering loveual activities between a child and some other party it could potentially inspire the viewer to perform similar acts, if you see a picture of a dead child you just get a really stuffty feeling

[Bloody Mary]

There's no industry based on producing images of dead children. Not yet, anyway.

[the hacker]

There's no industry based on producing images of dead children. Not yet, anyway.

I may have opened a rift in space-time, through which to collect millions of baby hands.

[sir dooble]

There's no industry based on producing images of dead children. Not yet, anyway.

Next time on, Dragon's Den...

[Steve5451²]

Cause dead people is documentation and legal. Child research is defined as any image of children in a loveualized way. These very well deserve to be illegal. However, you could document nudist families and their children all day as long as they aren't trying to be lovey. It makes sense imo. (no i don't go searching for that stuff)

Forcing children to perform love is an awful thing. Children cannot give consent to be in researchographic things. By looking at those pictures, you support the awful people who do those things.

I don't wanna sound like I'm defending it or anything, but most kiddie research is videos they take themselves. Hardly any rape at all.

[Bloody Mary]

I don't wanna sound like I'm defending it or anything, but most kiddie research is videos they take themselves. Hardly any rape at all.

Are you serious?

[Steve5451²]

Are you serious?

Yes.

[Daswiruch]

I don't wanna sound like I'm defending it or anything, but most kiddie research is videos they take themselves. Hardly any rape at all.

h-how would you know??