Author Topic: Anita is at it again  (Read 4262 times)

'Look at this video clip of a woman being harassed on Counter Strike'
There's a mute button. Use it.

after all, it's the most used button on tf2

They lie in the first 5 seconds of the video, you can obviously tell it's not going to be good because a lot of things like that.

« Last Edit: January 17, 2015, 12:39:23 AM by Rockinboy2000 »

well tbh the threats are a bit much


well tbh the threats are a bit much
The thing about that is
#GamerGate-rs actually identified many of the people that are harassing people like sarkeesian, and many of them weren't even pro-gg. One of them was neutral and harassing BOTH sides.

They even tried to report them to the police but they said that sarkeesian needed to file the reports herself, so they emailed everything to her. They never got a response back.

You have to understand, she feeds off the harassment. Without the harassment she's nothing. Nobody cares about her. When the harassment stops that's when the donations stop.

I find it funny in the video they claim they emailed rockstar about how women are portrayed in GTA and Ubisoft about Watch_Dogs

Um, hello fyi you can kill anyone you want in that game and it doesn't matter if they're a girl are you loving stupid. They most likely didn't reply because they knew how stupid your comment was and didn't even want to get near it. Really if you think that women are the main targets in video games, then you're so loving stupid that it makes me sick to see you around. I love how they don't even identify what gamergate is in the video, all they do is claim that one side is harassing the other, and Anita is so loving brain dead that she should not be allowed to do stuff like this, if she is the main face of feminism then I guess you can consider it a joke.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2015, 12:24:38 AM by Nal »

I don't get it.

..You guys are right now harassing this person, in some way shape or form.

..And the whole point of this supposed "movement" is about said harassment.

..Which means you're feeding the cycle that keeps this bullstuff going. Just stop talking about this person and stop giving the troll attention and the movement will wither and die. So long as specific gender is mentioned when talking about anybody there cannot be equality. Once gender is not mentioned, it becomes irrelevant, and then true equality can settle in.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2015, 12:45:33 AM by Randomness »


but she earns an income off of being harassed.
its not even about if its right or wrong anymore. her celebrity demands it and she needs it.

that makes her illegitimate as forget. but we have all realized that and we dont take it seriously. why havnt you?

..Which means you're feeding the cycle that keeps this bullstuff going. Just stop talking about this person and stop giving the troll attention and the movement will wither and die..
In a perfect world, no one would pay anyone like this any mind and would only be detested as attention seekers. Sadly, this is not a perfect world.

I don't get it.

..You guys are right now harassing this person, in some way shape or form.

..And the whole point of this supposed "movement" is about said harassment.

Made a beeline for that moral high ground before actually figuring out what gamergate is about, didn'tcha?

no kidding. gamer gate has nothing to do with loveism, woman or anything.

Remember that time before gamergate when we were all considerably less peeved at people on the internet?




Me neither.

To those claiming that how her capitalizing off of this event is wrong, shouldn't we realize that A) this is a social reform issue, and that her methods for gaining support are hardly different from any other social reform issue.  The progressives of the early 20th century did nothing but this for decades, and I'm sure people complained, but what change they brought was a new meaning of freedom in America that lasts to thus day.  Compared to some issues, this seems a more moderate cause than some of the other issues today.  And B) If we should not criticize how she earns it, we should better criticize how she spends it.  If all the money for this is going to social reform programs, then she is not in the least bit corrupt about it.  However, if the money goes towards an expensive haircut or something, I am hesitant to say that she is the right voice to represent this issue.

this cant be compared to that stuff. media is free to be created.
she (or anyone) isnt being hindered from creating the games they prefer.