Controversial topic.

[otto-san]

do you actually know what Riddler was actually trying to do...?
i mean, as far as i was concerned, he was seeking some kind of "perfect race" with "perfect genes"

NERDZI!!!

[Ad Bot]

[Oasis]

Yet another topic where people don't know how genetics work. Good job everyone.

[Swat 3]

isn't choosing agree basically Riddler morals

no this is in concern of the child who will have a lesser life due to physical, mental, or social disabilities.

but yet, disabilities usually aren't possible to inherent, but the question was people with certain inheritable disabilities.

[Ide]

Yet another topic where people don't know how genetics work. Good job everyone.

Elaborate please. We're very open to information about it because a big debate going on in VOIP.

[Slab Bulkhead]

"Guys, what's the one problem right now that's not going to be around in 2070?"

"The elderly and the disabled."

"CAUSE WE'RE JUST GONNA KILL EM!"
(x)

[OrkusBorkus]

ITT:

[Ipquarx]

Keep this in mind: It's already a crime to (BY CHOICE) permanently forget up someone's life, why should ANYONE be given lenience on that?

They should not be allowed to reproduce. They should not be allowed the choice of whether or not to permanently forget up a human life. It should be against the law because nobody deserves that to happen to them.

[Oasis]

Elaborate please. We're very open to information about it because a big debate going on in VOIP.

Sadly, genetics isn't you have a disease or you don't have a disease. You can carry the genes that cause certain genetic diseases for generations, and suddenly if say two couples with a recessive gene for a certain disease have a child, that child could have a chance to inherit the disease, not just as a recessive gene, but as an active disease. You usually can't test till later in the pregnancy if they do in-fact have both genes that would cause this, so normally its a crap shoot.

[fred da kiko]

Strongly disagree. While having kids should be highly not recommended, saying that someone isn't allowed to have a kid would be denying them their rights and infringing on their freedom. You can argue perfect society all you want, but the next step from that is to start taking away other freedoms. This sort of stuff has happened before and every time it ends poorly.

[OrkusBorkus]

Sadly, genetics isn't you have a disease or you don't have a disease. You can carry the genes that cause certain genetic diseases for generations, and suddenly if say two couples with a recessive gene for a certain disease have a child, that child could have a chance to inherit the disease, not just as a recessive gene, but as an active disease. You usually can't test till later in the pregnancy if they do in-fact have both genes that would cause this, so normally its a crap shoot.

except that the question regards disabilities and not diseases

[Oasis]

except that the question regards disabilities and not diseases

Holy stuff.

[Ide]

Holy stuff.

Yeah, how about you read threads instead of going around stuffting everywhere lol.

[otto-san]

uhh what oasis said still applies for disabilities lol

he literally described how basic genetics works

[Oasis]

Yeah, how about you read threads instead of going around stuffting everywhere lol.

Holy god.

uhh what oasis said still applies for disabilities lol

he literally described how basic genetics work

yeah

[Rally]

Assuming we're throwing out the slippery slope to 'no freedom', agree. :•] Hell, it's not like not being allowed to have biological kids is a terrible thing anyway but that could entirely be due to my disposition against small children. If you want them so bad you could adopt them anyway.