Controversial topic.

[Epicduke]

everyone should have the right to reproduce if they want. the only reproduction restrictions that I see well is a limit to kids if populations start to get out of control.

[Ad Bot]

[ThatRandomGuy]

I'm mixed about the topic...

[EcstaticEggplant]

forget this is a hard one.

It would be bad if they reproduced, as there will be another seriously disabled child and there would be nothing we could do about it. Maybe the family with the disabled parent/s would be encouraged to have safe love and would be given support for it, and if they are deemed as a fit parent then they could go for an adoption or ivf or sperm bank, just something that would stop their kid being forgeted over.

[Yosher]

putting a ban on it would be extreme imo, but it's still a really bad idea

[Oasis]

If every ethical/moral dilemma had to be rooted entirely in reality they'd all be very boring.

But hey if I need any help with 9th grade genetics I'll give you a buzz buddy :•]

If ethical and moral dilemma's aren't rooted in reality then they are completely useless.

[Pie Crust]

putting a ban on it would be extreme imo, but it's still a really bad idea

There's no need for banning. Let them have their fun. The only thing the government has to do is to spay and castrate.

[Katla]

Uh, no. First of all just because of bodily autonomy. You can't force someone to not have love. How will you even enforce it? On that same note, you can't force someone to get an abortion or a vasectomy or have their tubes tied. Those are even bigger violations of someone's bodily autonomy.
Secondly, it sets a bad precedent for how much the government is allowed to do.
And third, it's just morally wrong, plain and simple. Someone with Down's syndrome, for example, isn't guaranteed to have a hard life at all. A lot of the time, the worst thing they'll have to deal with is being made fun of by other people. Don't even try to tell me that's a reason to prevent them from existing, because that's not their fault or their parent's, it's only the fault of the people doing it.

no this is in concern of the child who will have a lesser life due to physical, mental, or social disabilities.

Well in that case there's nothing wrong with what the NSA is doing, either. They're just trying to keep the country safe. For the kids!

[Pie Crust]

Uh, no. First of all just because of bodily autonomy. You can't force someone to not have love. How will you even enforce it? On that same note, you can't force someone to get an abortion or a vasectomy or have their tubes tied. Those are even bigger violations of someone's bodily autonomy.
Secondly, it sets a bad precedent for how much the government is allowed to do.
And third, it's just morally wrong, plain and simple. Someone with Down's syndrome, for example, isn't guaranteed to have a hard life at all. A lot of the time, the worst thing they'll have to deal with is being made fun of by other people. Don't even try to tell me that's a reason to prevent them from existing, because that's not their fault or their parent's, it's only the fault of the people doing it.Well in that case there's nothing wrong with what the NSA is doing, either. They're just trying to keep the country safe. For the kids!

Neutering and spaying prevents their reproduction, reducing the ammount of genetically disabled humans drastically. Brilliant idea, if you ask me. Otherwise, just drop an axe on their head. There's no need for them to live a hard life nor to contaminate our species with useless mutations.

[Oasis]

Neutering and spaying prevents their reproduction, reducing the ammount of genetically disabled humans drastically. Brilliant idea, if you ask me. Otherwise, just drop an axe on their head. There's no need for them to live a hard life nor to contaminate our species with useless mutations.

I bet you have a lot of useless mutations. Where's the axe?

[Pie Crust]

I bet you have a lot of useless mutations. Where's the axe?

In the back of the shed. A hard, dry hit so the victim doesn't notice it.

[Katla]

Neutering and spaying prevents their reproduction, reducing the ammount of genetically disabled humans drastically. Brilliant idea, if you ask me. Otherwise, just drop an axe on their head. There's no need for them to live a hard life nor to contaminate our species with useless mutations.

It could probably be said that zoophilia is a mental disorder. Sooo.

[Maxwell.]

It could probably be said that zoophilia is a mental disorder. Sooo.

it is, humans should not be wanting to forget animals at all

[Pie Crust]

There's no danger of me spreading the disease since the DNA is incompatible. I do not fall under the neuter/spay/axe.

[c]

There's no danger of me spreading the disease since the DNA is incompatible. I do not fall under the neuter/spay/axe.

your parents dna was incompatible it seems too

[Pie Crust]

your parents dna was incompatible it seems too

If they were, I wouldn't be here.