Author Topic: so a chemical plant exploded in the Ukraine  (Read 4975 times)

Okay so how much is actually known about this? I don't trust news to have anything accurate right now. Was it really confirmed to be artillery shell that caused it?

pack your bags, fellow stalkers

There was a thread about this on IGN, the op thought it was a nuke, lol

There was a thread about this on IGN, the op thought it was a nuke, lol

OP thought it was one too. To be be fair, it looked like one from afar.

OP thought it was one too. To be be fair, it looked like one from afar.
I haven't been able to watch the video, but I've gathered from this thread that many people think it was a nuclear weapon because of a mushroom cloud. Which is funny, and absurd. There's nothing special about a nuclear weapon that makes a mushroom cloud. Any large, hot explosion will.
(I don't imagine there could be a cold explosion, adding "hot" is just a hint as to why mushroom clouds occur.)

And brightness certainly isn't a clue, either. Christ.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2015, 02:06:11 AM by Katla »

as a guy from north-eastern romania [read: right next to ukraine] i'm actually somewhat worried by where the chemical cloud will go

Okay so how much is actually known about this? I don't trust news to have anything accurate right now. Was it really confirmed to be artillery shell that caused it?
You don't the trust news companies, the people whose job it is to gather information on events across the world, to be accurate in giving you information on this.
But you do trust the 12-20 year olds of the Blockland Forums, most of whom live over 5000 miles away from the event to have accurate information?


I haven't been able to watch the video, but I've gathered from this thread that many people think it was a nuclear weapon because of a mushroom cloud. Which is funny, and absurd. There's nothing special about a nuclear weapon that makes a mushroom cloud. Any large, hot explosion will.
(I don't imagine there could be a cold explosion, adding "hot" is just a hint as to why mushroom clouds occur.)

And brightness certainly isn't a clue, either. Christ.
>95% of man made explosions with mushroom clouds are nukes
>"absurd" and "funny" to assume it was a nuke from the mushroom cloud

seems like a fairly logical guess to me. If I were them I wouldn't jump to conclusions, but I wouldn't exclude "nuke" from my list of suspicions.




>95% of man made explosions with mushroom clouds are nukes
Definitely gonna need some sources on that. If you'd said "man-made explosions in movies," then I'd believe you, easily. But nope.

Why does everybody start their titles with "so" now? That's not how you start a sentence.

Why does everybody start their titles with "so" now? That's not how you start a sentence.
They think they're literally talking to us in person, the idiots.