Author Topic: Apple is working on tech for a car  (Read 2690 times)

OPp - Original Poster's post. :(
op has tons of different meanings m8, one of them meaning original post

Overpowered, Original Poster, etc.

i thought we could figure it out easily by using deduction since we are also on a forum but whatever hahahahahahahha :(

what

that's not how it works

well, duh, to locate desitination, but it would probably sense that when the coords get "scrambled" (lol), it would be running into cars and trees are would brake.
Prior to the Gulf War, the US military was able to scramble the GPS frequencies for civilian equipment. Basically the coordinates you saw on the GPS were not the true coordinates and eventually people figured out how to undue that and the government gave up on it.


Idk why anyone would trust apple to make a self navigating car. Everyone knows what happened when they made their own map/navigation system, but this time it WILL take you off that pier!
The original Apple Maps sucked ass, it's not that bad now; although not perfect. Also self driving cars would be under rigorous testing and inspection before it even hit the streets, nonetheless be sold to the public.

Just reaching another excuse for you to hate on Apple.
Apple is working on a selfdriving cars. Knowing Apple's conflict with Google, Apple will probably use Apple Maps. We're all forgeted.
Self driving cars run off built in sensors like cameras, radar, etc.


Will this run on a special gasoline only available at Apple stores?

Just reaching another excuse for you to hate on Apple.
It's not an excuse, it's a reason bb

i can slash somebody's tires or mess around with the brakes, hell i can brick the loving engine if i had physical access to the car and a few tools. the problem that you think is there isn't relegated to just automated cars.
There are lots of models of cars out there that have gone completely electronic, that is, software controls the steering, brakes, accel, etc. I believe there have been several ted talks (not sure if many people know about them, they're pretty cool) talking about how every single one they've come across they've been able to hack into and remotely control the car

And the reason that's the case is because there's absolutely no way to stop an attacker that has physical access to said machine, from tampering with it and putting a remote control unit on it.

That's all I'm saying.

i wouldn't trust apple to drive me anywhere, their maps are stuff

i would feel safer in automatic cars if they were on rails. i want trolleys back

It's not an excuse, it's a reason bb
You're quite the hypocrite aren't you. In the other Apple thread awhile back you kept bitching at me to make logical arguments, and every time I did you would sit there and make smart ass remarks just like this one. You are incapable of having a debate about Apple because you can't get over your senseless hate for it.

You're quite the hypocrite aren't you. In the other Apple thread awhile back you kept bitching at me to make logical arguments, and every time I did you would sit there and make smart ass remarks just like this one. You are incapable of having a debate about Apple because you can't get over your senseless hate for it.
I'm actually laughing at you because of how rustled you are that someone doesn't like apple.

i mean to be fair it is actually a reason and it logically follows to some extent even though a self-driving car would be quite a bit more complex than a navigation system

i don't think it's very fair to dismiss someone's thoughts as being an empty vessel to push some arrogant agenda. it's esp not fair to then make quick asessments about their character from that assumption

cant self driving cars get viruses