Poll

Is it.

yes. killed by colonel mustard.
20 (22.7%)
no. killed by miss scarlett
3 (3.4%)
killed by mrs. white
5 (5.7%)
killed by reverend green
3 (3.4%)
Professor Plum.
7 (8%)
killed by mrs pearooster
11 (12.5%)
with a lead pipe
3 (3.4%)
with a revolver
6 (6.8%)
with a wrench
4 (4.5%)
with a rope
13 (14.8%)
with a dagger
3 (3.4%)
with a candlestick
10 (11.4%)

Total Members Voted: 46

Author Topic: Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®  (Read 422398 times)

idk. and I don't really care how it's done. how is that important?

"i don't care how it's done, i just think, yknow, we should trust the government no matter what they come up with"

So you want the higher ups to take weapons off the street but you don't have the first clue on how they might do it?
Yeah, you and the rest of us. That's why we don't do it. The scary part is that you still support it.

I feel like we would be better off if guns were limited from the start, but nowadays it would be so hard to enforce.

I don't feel like civilians need military-grade weapons though. Sure, keep them in like firing arms and shooting ranges but I don't feel like you should be able to keep them in your home.

You see, I'm more informed than you.
lmao
yeah, you sure loving are, buddy, i guess everybody else is wrong!

ok? so?

Not everyone knows how to safely operate a gas stove, but that doesn't mean they should be outlawed

my views on firearms are as following-

civilians should be able to own everything short of weapons that have a fully automatic firing mode, and everything short of antimaterial rifles. you don't need an AS-50 for hunting or home defense. same applies for assault rifles.

police should be able to own rocket launchers and light machineguns.


also, people need to be educated more on guns. the large majority of rifles sold to civilians that look like assault rifles perform similarly to their early-mid 20th century semiautomatic cousins.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2015, 05:29:05 PM by Juncoph »

is everyone in the country responsible with their guns? no
People don't drink responsibly, even though their adults.
People don't take care of their children responsibly.
People don't drive responsibly.

Should alcohol, children, and cars be banned? I don't understand. Every legal, law abiding gun owner didn't kill someone or him/herself today. Go figure.

lmao
yeah, you sure loving are, buddy, i guess everybody else is wrong!
Obviously you don't understand my point, typical of you.

Obviously you don't understand my point, typical of you.
Nobody understands you because either you're too much of an intellectual for us *tips fedora* or you just babble nonsense that makes no sense whatsoever.

The one that I'm pretty sure most would agree with the latter.

Or you just don't understand what i'm trying to say, simple as that.

Guys stop bringing stuff to a personal level. You're arguing about how you don't understand each other when the debate is guns lmao

Or you just don't understand what i'm trying to say, simple as that.
Yes, everybody misunderstands you, obviously everyone but you is an idiot.

Yes, everybody misunderstands you, obviously everyone but you is an idiot.
just because I stated you misunderstood what I said doesn't mean I implied you were and idiot just fyi

Guys stop bringing stuff to a personal level. You're arguing about how you don't understand each other when the debate is guns lmao
well this is off- topic after all *da bum tss*

just because I stated you misunderstood what I said doesn't mean I implied you were and idiot just fyi
Yes, take an exaggeration in my statement literally while ignoring the actual point. That'll show them.

This is going nowhere at this point. Re read the post you misunderstood maybe it will make sense