Poll

Is it.

yes. killed by colonel mustard.
20 (22.7%)
no. killed by miss scarlett
3 (3.4%)
killed by mrs. white
5 (5.7%)
killed by reverend green
3 (3.4%)
Professor Plum.
7 (8%)
killed by mrs pearooster
11 (12.5%)
with a lead pipe
3 (3.4%)
with a revolver
6 (6.8%)
with a wrench
4 (4.5%)
with a rope
13 (14.8%)
with a dagger
3 (3.4%)
with a candlestick
10 (11.4%)

Total Members Voted: 46

Author Topic: Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®  (Read 433878 times)

wtf? we have not even been to mars yet, it has not been that far.
If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times, Maxwell!

Science isn't going to get us to Mars!

Art is going to get us to Mars!

If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times, Maxwell!

Science isn't going to get us to Mars!

Art is going to get us to Mars!
I've told you MANY times before we can't just DRAW a rocket

...

Or wait. Can we. This has not been debated.

I've told you MANY times before we can't just DRAW a rocket

...

Or wait. Can we. This has not been debated.
you have to draw the rocket before you can fly the rocket obv

Interpretive dance will also work.

yeah man string theory? forget that i aint made out of no forgetin silly string
hahaha string theory hahahaha i think id know if i was made out of some string hahaha

   ~ alternative

Done by humans?  Bah!
The scientific method itself is, the people are not as much so, buuuut i'd argue that they're pretty darn close at this point, that's just an opinion.

How could science be real if we're not real.


2x2 is 4x
no, 2 x2's are x2 because the 2 is eaten by the x2, I just didn't write the x because it's a homoloveual and I hate those

hahaha string theory hahahaha i think id know if i was made out of some string hahaha

   ~ alternative
brother what

no, 2 x2's are x2 because the 2 is eaten by the x2, I just didn't write the x because it's a homoloveual and I hate those
hes technically right
according to actual math law 2x2 is the same as 2x(2)


Well science does explain a lot, but I don't think it can explain everything. It sure can't make up it's mind though. Pluto use to be planet, then they said it wasn't a planet anymore and it was a moon or asteroid, now it's a micro planet. Then there is the panda where people can't make up it's mind if its a bear of if it is related to a raccoon. How does one measure entropy any way?

I do hate those people who go around saying religion is obsolete because we have science now or something.

i am a theist but i think its cool that theres a mathematic equation for virtually everything ever

science is simply a process by which we can explain and understand the natural world (not the supernatural, we leave that to religion). whether or not current theories are accurate doesn't matter so much because we know from history that the process always rights itself eventually, because science builds on itself, and often it's not too hard to tell when your foundations are messed up

the only problem with science is when people don't use it correctly. of course we're human so gg. still always eventually settles itself on what really works after all the politics or other nonsense is cleared up