Author Topic: CIA has destroyed ancient statues and artifacts from the Assyrian Empire  (Read 9248 times)


im just making a joke twathat :(
no, i actually mean stop being spaz
like, you're flipping stuff over some minor thing and lashing out at the people who disagree with you. calm the forget down lol
not to mention you're totally wrong here. you admitted yourself that it wasn't the original definition. dont hold other people accountable for not understanding your definition

im spazzing because i dont take internet arguments serious and also dont care about what people think of me because it lasts maybe a week tops

im spazzing because i dont take internet arguments serious and also dont care about what people think of me because it lasts maybe a week tops
or you could just not start stuff \o/

or you could just not start stuff \o/
i didnt even start lol i just said NSFW and then someone just had to be a linguistic hardbutt \o/

They have no regard for any culture other than the "culture" they wish to impose. Pathetic really. But involvement in any conflict with them would  be futile. Guerrilla warfare only benefits the guerrillas. They are not a tangible threat to the continental United States at the moment, I don't see the point of getting involved. It would be a war of attrition and a waste of money, supplies, and lives. It would be like fighting the Viet Cong, they disappear when we arrive and drag us into a war of attrition. We do not need boots on the ground at this moment, what we need is to make an example of those who have left Western countries to aid ISIL.

im spazzing because i dont take internet arguments serious and also dont care about what people think of me because it lasts maybe a week tops
You are forgetting this is the forum that holds grudges. Take Furdle, Lord Tony, Iban, and Kalphiter for example. Stop being posting here in this thread, you are only making it worse for yourself.

i didnt even start lol i just said NSFW and then someone just had to be a linguistic hardbutt \o/
because that's literally what nsfw means
if you said something like "this video can be considered offensive" then you would have been correct. nsfw literally means Not Safe For Work. it doesn't get much simpler than that, and if you think slapping your own definition on there and throwing a fit when people don't agree with your re-definition is their problem, you're the one holding the gun

They have no regard for any culture other than the "culture" they wish to impose. Pathetic really. But involvement in any conflict with them would  be futile. Guerrilla warfare only benefits the guerrillas. They are not a tangible threat to the continental United States at the moment, I don't see the point of getting involved. It would be a war of attrition and a waste of money, supplies, and lives. It would be like fighting the Viet Cong, they disappear when we arrive and drag us into a war of attrition. We do not need boots on the ground at this moment, what we need is to make an example of those who have left Western countries to aid ISIL.
gah the middle east is a forgetin mess
and throwing even more soldiers into the mix probably isn't going to do it much good

i didnt even start lol i just said NSFW and then someone just had to be a linguistic hardbutt \o/
I asked a question and you attacked me with your incredibly annoying passive aggressiveness
then when I try explaining more you continued your passive aggressiveness. I even agreed with you a bit, then you continued to persist with it, with a little less passiveness that time

the only thing I can see that would be seen as an attack from me was my first comment

They have no regard for any culture other than the "culture" they wish to impose. Pathetic really. But involvement in any conflict with them would  be futile. Guerrilla warfare only benefits the guerrillas. They are not a tangible threat to the continental United States at the moment, I don't see the point of getting involved. It would be a war of attrition and a waste of money, supplies, and lives. It would be like fighting the Viet Cong, they disappear when we arrive and drag us into a war of attrition. We do not need boots on the ground at this moment, what we need is to make an example of those who have left Western countries to aid ISIL.

This is where elite special forces come in.

i didnt even start lol i just said NSFW and then someone just had to be a linguistic hardbutt \o/

because you're a linguistic dumbbutt lol

gah the middle east is a forgetin mess
and throwing even more soldiers into the mix probably isn't going to do it much good
It is the failure of American foreign policy and the current state of much of the middle east can be seen as a result of proxy wars and imperialism. It is the failure of western diplomacy that caused the never-ending power vacuum in the Middle East, and sending troops won't correct that. I don't understand why the media (and MANY people I've spoken to as well) is trying to cheerlead us into yet another disastrous conflict in the Middle East.

This is where elite special forces come in.
We had special forces in Vietnam and that didn't do us much good. Guerrilla warfare prevents conventional methods of making war from being effective. ISIL is only a threat to isolated Americans in the Middle East, very far from the vast majority of Americans in the Continental US. I don't see why we would willingly fight a war of attrition if ISIL isn't a threat to the vast majority of Americans at the moment.


itt: CIA and lavender making asses out of themselves
again

itt: CIA and lavender making asses out of themselves
again
I don't see why Lavender is so openly hostile. This is a forum on the internet. Nothing you do here will matter later in life. There is no "pride" on the line. Nothing is at stake. I don't see the point of being disrespectful just for the hell of being disrespectful.