https://www.aclu.org/criminal-law-reform-racial-justice/aclu-challenges-debt-collection-practices-target-poorhttps://www.aclu.org/racial-justice/here-we-go-again-communities-color-foreclosure-crCIA-and-loan-servicing-failures
http://www.aclum.org/stopandfrisk
Cops have been targetting poor neighboorhoods, which Ive already stated tends to have a higher concentration of 'minorities'. This is not the only problem with it though, cuz stop and frisk is extremely unconstitutional too
It certainly isn't over, but it isn't bad enough to warrant random acts of violence
Yes poor people get forgeted over
This data is 5 years old, for all you know it could have improved by now.
corruption of certain unfortunate members of political or public significance isn't really indicative of a system of abuses, it's indicative of a system of fools more than anything else. .
You and other people are dismissing this as, 'hurr poor ppl'.
So you people think that minorities are on equal footing with white people because these incidents only have to those afflicted by poverty?
That a cop will never racially profile a black person if they're not poor-looking? Even BBC knows what's up.
Also notice how none of those people rioting are called 'thugs'
I dare any one of you people to rationalize this
Or this
Those people are only poor
This 11 year old girl was poor
I wanna see you guys try to rationalize this
But noooooooooooooo
It doesn't exist no more
Not at all
What's happening here isn't unconstitutional
This is the most naive thing I have ever read in a long time.
YAlso notice how none of those people rioting are called 'thugs'
Yeah except none of the riots here were based on racial issues at all
It's a system of abuse if those cops aren't being charged and/or fired.
so rioting about racial issues makes you a thug...
When did I say that at allHis argument was obviously race related, and I was just pointing out how it wasn't
the last time some black kid came up to me and said "when i say slavery you say sorry. Slavery"i said your welcome and walked away.
yes his argument is race-related. he is saying that nobody calls these rioting white people thugs. your response is saying that none of the white people were rioting about race. which tells me that you're saying they're not called thugs because they're not rioting about race