Author Topic: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill  (Read 48674 times)


genocide tho
g   e   n   o   c   i   d   e
e
n
o
c
i
d
e
and that, according to you two, discredits his other achievements?
that's like saying Riddler didn't revive the german economy, yeah, he was a genocidal manic, but I don't look into the topic with tunnel vision

I hate andrew jackson and want him off the dollar, but discrediting people just because you don't like them makes you stupid and ignorant


i think you missed the point that it literally does not matter

are you saying that clearing up the national debt and preventing succession isnt good?
It went on the rise two years later.

Clearing the debt was probably a feat for one president to do but wasn't a very useful act.
thank you for not being an idiot like some people
You are like the main dumbass though.

And while we're talking about OLD presidents we're going to be talking about the OLD stuff they did.

i'd take tubman over jackson anytime because she really is an icon of freedom for the country rather than someone who killed off the natives.

even though jackson was a good president, what he did was wrong

And while we're talking about OLD presidents we're going to be talking about the OLD stuff they did.
that doesn't make that OLD stuff matter any more now does it

i think you missed the point that it literally does not matter
"genocide doesnt matter"
                  -nonnel, 2015

that doesn't make that OLD stuff matter any more now does it
It does when talking about the accomplishments of the president?

What else would???

dont matter to me. cash is loving handicapped to carry anyways lol


spamming 'genocide' into people's faces won't get them to change their goddamn opinion, kimon!
you have no legitimate arguments besides 'he did a genocide1!'

that doesn't make that OLD stuff matter any more now does it
with that train of thought, that means all of jackson's other actions are of no matter.

rather than tubman, whose accomplishments have affected the country's people to this day, he'd have no place on the bill.

it was clearly because they had to use a black person. there is no debate about that.

but it should have been MLK

"genocide doesnt matter"
                  -nonnel, 2015
genocide that happened to a small amount of people 200 years ago? no. no it does not.

It does when talking about the accomplishments of the president?
but things they did right =/= things they did wrong
the things he did wrong have no effect on us today, why focus on them

actually now that bisjac mentions it, having mlk on a dollar bill would be a splendid idea

you have no legitimate arguments besides 'he did a genocide1!'
because he committed genocide. he is not a good person. this is some simple stuff.
genocide that happened to a small amount of people 200 years ago? no. no it does not.
dude you are literally a loving dumbass idk what to say to you