Author Topic: Complaint against Badspot  (Read 13467 times)


I expect a 5-page essay on Badspot's facial hair next time.

I expect a 5-page essay on Badspot's facial hair next time.

Or his disappearing head hair

I marked my calendar. Be there or be square.

I would greatly appreciate one about me, bob



Bobahs viewing Steve's profile, prepare for some fire.

Bobahs viewing Steve's profile, prepare for some fire.

You think I'm going to get him? You are very mistaken.

I am writing this letter rather reluctantly. I do not wish to begin an incendiary debate about Chairwoman Kidplasma's protests. However, Kidplasma has recently made a few statements that I find disturbing to such a degree that I cannot remain silent. By way of introduction, let me just say that Kidplasma is doubtlessly exasperated by the limitations that have thus far denied him the ability to plunge us into the dark abyss of annihilation. Understanding this generates a premise for getting people to see through the hollowness, the sham, the silliness of Kidplasma's randy orations. Furthermore, it leads in turn to an understanding of how he should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.

If you think about it you'll see that Kidplasma's caustic plans for the future are merely a distraction. They're just something to generate more op-ed pieces, more news conferences for media talking heads, and more punditry from people like me. Meanwhile, Kidplasma's associates are continuing their quiet work of advancing Kidplasma's real goal, which is to worsen an already unstable situation. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the main dissensus between me and Kidplasma is that I contend that Kidplasma's imperium is a brain-damaged cult based on hatred and exploitation. Kidplasma, on the other hand, avows that anyone who disagrees with him is a potential terrorist. His patsies portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression but are loath to reveal that Kidplasma's primary goal is to erect a shrine of onanism. All of his other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose. That's why you must always remember that if Kidplasma could have one wish, he'd wish for the ability to poison the relationship between teacher and student. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that I don't just want to make a point. I don't just want to establish clear, justifiable definitions of totalism and desperadoism so that one can defend a decision to take action when Kidplasma's zealots introduce more restrictions on our already dwindling freedoms. I'm here to give an alternate solution, a better one. I don't just ask rhetorical questions; I have answers. That's why I'm telling you that Kidplasma avouches that his gibes will universally benefit all mankind. In reality, his gibes will benefit only those jejune ogres who encourage and exacerbate passivity in some people who might otherwise be active and responsible citizens. As I like to say, you cannot link arms under a universalist banner when you can't find your own name on it. By that I mean that Kidplasma believes that embracing a system of rowdyism will make everything right with the world. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by Kidplasma and his self-centered, fatuitous cronies.

Concrete examples abound of ways to tackle the multinational death machine that Kidplasma is currently constructing. For instance, consider that Kidplasma counts the most vainglorious publishers of hate literature you'll ever see as his friends. Unfortunately for him, these are hired friends, false friends, friends incapable of realizing for a moment that Kidplasma will marginalize the traditions and truths upon which our nation's greatness sits one of these days. Alas, this is not a tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory. It is cold, hard fact. A related fact is that a central fault line runs through each of Kidplasma's communications. Specifically, Kidplasma's subordinates are quick to point out that because Kidplasma is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, he is the real victim here. The truth is that, if anything, Kidplasma is a victim of his own success—a success that enables Kidplasma to hamstring our efforts to solve the problems of conformism, anarchism, economic inequality, and lack of equal opportunity.

It is immature and stupid of Kidplasma to stigmatize any and all attempts to provide you with a holistic and thematic history of his querimonious publicity stunts. It would be mature and intelligent, however, to give him condign punishment, and that's why I say that just as night follows day, he will force us to tailor our catch-phrases just to suit his juvenile whims sooner than you think. Call me old-fashioned, but when he says that hanging out with poxy roisterers is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.

Kidplasma just reported that he is a man of peace. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on Kidplasma's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to invade every private corner and force every thought into an irritable mold. He seizes every opportunity to nurture the seeds of our eventual destruction so that they grow like a rapidly malignant mutant form of kudzu. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that Kidplasma is widely seen as unforgivable for compromising the things that define us, including integrity, justice, love, and sharing. Expect him to lie low for a while and allow public amnesia to expurgate the immediacy of his sins. Afterwards, he'll indeed return to preventing the real problems from being solved. My hope, though, is that the second time around, people will be aware of the fact that Kidplasma wants to undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole. Faugh.

Now let's go back to what I was saying earlier about how we must take the initiative to speak truth to power in such a way that there is nothing Kidplasma can do about it except learn to live with the fait accompli. As I previously stated, his occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are Kidplasma's promises. In fact, if we let him deface property with racially and loveually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols, then greed, corruption, and Chekism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions.

Kidplasma's declamations cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing Kidplasma and the wanton, short-sighted criminal masterminds in his guild. We must compile readers' remarks and suggestions and use them to redefine in practical terms the immutable ideals that have guided us from the beginning. Only then can a society free of his disreputable, balmy practices blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that the last time I told his collaborators that I want to express our concerns about his condescending prank phone calls they declared in response, “But profits come before people.” Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. Kidplasma's phalanx of humorless, stingy knee-biters is not a cultural or religious assemblage, as Kidplasma purports it to be. Rather, it serves an overtly political purpose—and hard-core political at that.

Kidplasma truly believes that he is a model citizen. I hope you realize that that's just a savage pipe dream from a nefarious, narrow-minded pipe and that in the real world, we must soon make one of the most momentous decisions in history. We must decide whether to let Kidplasma convince impressionable young people that he is entitled to prepare the ground for an ever-more vicious and brutal campaign of terror or, alternatively, whether we should bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. Upon this decision rests the stability of society and the future peace of the world. My view on this decision is that we've all heard Kidplasma's pontifical pronouncement that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of imperialism. Obviously, that conclusion is based on unconfirmed gossip, questionably-sourced reports, and blatant speculation, but it's also the case that our national media is controlled by bloody-minded jackanapes. That's why you probably haven't heard that whenever Kidplasma attempts to form the association in the public's mind between any malisons he disagrees with and the ideas of hate and violence and illegality, he looks around waiting for applause as if he's done something decent and moral rather than scurrilous and neo-callous.

Everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, “The Naked Aggression of Kidplasma”. In it, I chronicle all of Kidplasma's methods of interpretation from the loveist to the infantile and conclude that Kidplasma's cabal is an island of repression in a sea of freedom. One should therefore conclude, ipso facto, that life is a search for the true, the good, and the beautiful. It is not, as he claims, an excuse to smear people of impeccable character and reputation.

I clearly maintain that we should brush away the cobwebs of resistentialism, and I have formalized my commitment to this high ideal by ensuring that I always do something good for others. I must ask that Kidplasma's thralls, who are legion, lend support to the thesis that learning the truth can be a painful experience, especially for Kidplasma. I know they'll never do that so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to palm off our present situation as the compelling ground for worldwide neopaganism. The recent outrage at Chairwoman Kidplasma's hastily mounted campaigns may point to a brighter future. For now, however, I must leave you knowing that it is important to realize that he has been snaffling far more than his fair share of attention.

Chairwoman Kidplasma

OH, stuff
"The Naked Agression of Kidplasma"

Chairwoman Kidplasma

He is a chairwoman cuz he a pusillanimous individual bitch


I've been patient with Freek. I've even avoided being drawn in by his provocative rhetoric. But I've finally had enough. Let me begin by observing that the proverbs of Theognis, like those of Solomon, are observations on human nature, ordinary life, and civil society, with moral reflections on the facts. I quote him as a witness of the fact that we find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that brash bribe-seekers are easily housebroken. This belief is due to a basic confusion that can be cleared up simply by stating that it doesn't really matter why Freek wants to use every conceivable form of diplomacy, deception, pressure, coercion, bribery, treason, and terror to lock people up for reading the “wrong” types of books or listening to the “wrong” sorts of music. Whether it's due to a misplaced faith in fascism, bribes paid to Freek by illiterate vulgarians, or nagging from some of the verbally incontinent blusterers in his plunderbund, the fact remains that that's what Freek wants. What I want, in contrast, is to notify you that he should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.

This is a free country, and I claim we ought to keep it that way. I'm by no means the first person to expose Freek as a stubborn deadbeat. However, it's still somewhat rare for anyone to state publicly that he has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which the government (and perhaps he himself) should have sweeping powers to arrest and hold people indefinitely on flimsy grounds. Then again, just because Freek is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to shred the basic compact between the people and their government. His ideological colors may have changed over the years. Nevertheless, Freek's core principle has remained the same: to commit acts of banditry and insurgency. If you don't believe me then note that some of the facts I'm about to present may seem shocking. This they certainly are. However, that's not the most frightening thing about Freek. Have you heard that he is trying to promulgate partisan prejudice against others just to prove he can? I find information like that disturbing on so many levels that I can't help but want to put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity.

Freek's speeches are full of declamation, bloviation, obfuscation, and equivocation. That said, let me continue. By writing this letter, I am clearly sticking my head far above the parapet. The big danger is that Freek will retaliate against me. He'll most likely try to force me to take the coward's path and do nothing to stop him from subjecting us to an intense barrage of misinformation, deception, and hidden propaganda although another possibility is that his shady business deals are designed to enrich him while turning the trickle of revanchism into a tidal wave. Alas, I usually get a lot of blank stares from people when I say something like that. What I mean is that Freek can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could sugarcoat the past and dispense false optimism for the future.

What I call slatternly, diabolic mumpsimuses create an untrue and injurious impression of an entire people. That said, we mustn't lose sight of who the real enemy is: Freek and his pertinacious loyalists. I believe it was Hegel who said, “The practice of calling evil good and good evil is fastuous and prodigal”. No doubt, he often compares himself to Jesus, usually on the grounds that I'm trying to crucify Freek for speaking the truth. But Freek's haughty chargés d'affaires are nothing more than subservient blobs of easily controlled protoplasm. That's why they're so willing to help Freek destroy any resistance by channeling it into ineffective paths.

It's good that you're reading this letter. It's good that you're listening to what I'm saying. But reading and listening aren't enough. You must also be willing to help me respond to Freek's Ponzi schemes.

I don't know what to do about the rise in unilateralism I see all around me. Freek's solution. not surprisingly, is to doctor evidence and classification systems and make uncontrollable generalizations to support lewd, preconceived views. This is one case in which the cure is definitely worse than the disease. It disturbs me that these orgulous, disorderly wallies have so little tolerance for differing points of view. I hardly need to add that he has a knack for convincing loopy caitiffs that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic pink pixie dust over everything that he considers moralistic-to-the-core or grotty. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like “pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis” and “roentgenographic” to keep his sales pitch from sounding wretched. That's why you really have to look hard to see that Freek has a different view of reality from the rest of us. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation.

As a general rule, Freek has developed a toolkit, brand, and library of imagery and slogans to be used and adapted to the specific needs and agenda of any group that shares a desire to peddle the snake oil of cold-blooded Tartuffism. This notion is vulnerable to cynicism but can also act as the lynchpin to great acts of solidarity. It has the potential to encourage people to lift our national policy from the quicksand of racial injustice to the solid rock of human dignity. It can convince even the most brutal dead-enders there are that Freek wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving him lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that only through education can individuals gain the independent tools they need to fight for our freedom of speech. But the first step is to acknowledge that he wants us to believe that sentencing more and more people to poverty, prison, and early death is essential for the safety and welfare of the public. A shockingly high number of intelligent people buy into that deception, unfortunately. I say we need to inform such people that all of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of Freek's blasphemous hastily mounted campaigns. They are not a cause; they are an effect.

It is no news that I am thoroughly bewildered by the way that Freek likens his indecent outbursts to the founding principles that shaped our nation. Not only do those two things lack equivalence, but they are not even commensurate, and volumes won't clarify a contrast that is apparent at first glance. It's like comparing a book of children's poetry to a research report that provides hard evidence that Freek has been trying to trick people into believing that we'll be moved by some heartfelt words on the glories of alcoholism. Apparently, he has succeeded beyond his wildest dreams with imperious peddlers of snake-oil remedies; they're now fully convinced that Freek would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform an abrasive act.

There are rumors circulating that society has pampered Freek too long, so let me just clarify something: You should never forget the three most important facets of Freek's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments), namely their overweening origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. If he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that he can exhibit a deep disdain for all people who are not mephitic schlubs and get away with it, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Eccentric Rhetoric. In the meantime, Freek justifies his audacious lamentations with fallacious logical arguments based on argumentum ad baculum. In case you're unfamiliar with the term, it means that if we don't accept Freek's claim that everything will be hunky-dory if we let him undermine the basic values of work, responsibility, and family then he will destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. If someone were to usher in the beginning of a dodgy new era of clericalism, I'd rather it be an army of revolting schmoes than he because the latter is superstitious, while the former are only execrable. It's clear enough that Freek knew of his assistants' plans to eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny. However, Freek contented himself with a private, pro forma call for restraint—in other words, a green light. This call may even have encouraged his assistants' actions by obscuring the fact that I want to make this clear so that those who do not understand deeper messages embedded within sarcastic irony—and you know who I'm referring to—can process my point.

There are two challenges we must face if we wish to repair the pretentious world we have inherited from Freek. The first challenge is to hold him responsible for the hatred he so furtively expresses. This is only slightly less difficult than the second challenge, which is to convey to people the knowledge that our path is set. By this, I mean that in order to listen to others, we must work beyond the predatory plasticity of his memoranda. I consider that requirement a small price to pay because Freek's long-term goals have merged with wowserism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both inaugurate an era of officious anarchism. And both combine the most sordid avarice with the most invincible hatred of the very people who tolerate and enrich him. That's all I have time now to write. If you want to get more insight into Freek's mentality, though, then study the details of his declamations. Try to see the big picture: It will unmistakably amaze you. It will take your breath away. And it will convince you that Freek's assertions are the perfect exemplification of the entire panoply of avaricious views held by the most intolerant nincompoops you'll ever see.