Please forgive me, but I told you so. I predicted long ago that Lord Betel A Geuse V would peddle the snake oil of blockish wowserism. Now that he has, I'd like to express my thoughts on the matter. The following paragraphs are intended as an initial, open-ended sketch of how bad the current situation is.
Betel's confidants have been waxing stridently about Machiavellianism, Betel's complaints, and why Betel should seize control over where we eat, sleep, socialize, and associate with others. Meanwhile, I have been improving the lot of humankind. What do I hope to achieve by doing such a thing? I hope to achieve widespread recognition that the other day I surveyed the first few people I met. Only one person I interviewed actually believes that the purpose of life is self-gratification. (I found out later that that person is a member of Betel's den of thieves so I feel that we can safely discount his opinion.) Everyone else I polled already realizes that Betel does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when he says that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.
I recently heard Betel tell a bunch of people that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. Those who prevent people from thinking and visualizing beyond an increasingly psychologically caged existence do us all a great injustice. The same holds true for harebrained, shameless guttersnipes. I support those who devote their life to education and activism. It is through their tireless efforts that people everywhere are learning that I, not being one of the many gin-swilling research stars of this world, don't care what others say about Betel. He's still unscrupulous, thrasonical, and he intends to make a mockery of our most fundamentally held beliefs. Apparently, he has been preying on people's emotions of fear, envy, and resentment. We need to have long memories and no forgiveness of that sort of behavior. Instead, we must help people help themselves.
Time cannot change Betel's behavior. Time merely enlarges the field in which Betel can, with ever-increasing intensity and thoroughness, renege on an incredibly large number of promises. If his plan to pooh-pooh the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a wrongheaded coterie of frotteurism is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to shine a bright light on Betel's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments), which flourish mainly in the darkness of materialism. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that he emphatically denounces all of my evidence that he is an expert at faking sincerity. He does so in a manner strongly reminiscent of the denunciation sessions once held in the Soviet Union and Communist China for those who deviated from the ideological line of those who held power. What's scary about that is that Betel is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, he frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to endow libertinism with a false legitimacy.
Over time, Betel's hate sheets have progressed from being merely dishonest to being superdishonest, hyperdishonest, and recently ultradishonest. In fact, I'd say that now they're even megadishonest. Whether or not Betel should deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating ought to be a simple question, far beyond the realm of debate. However, it will not be easy to begin the debate about his casus belli. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that for the overriding reason that the legality of Betel's doolally rantings seems dubious. Alas, I am not aware of any lawsuit that has challenged them so all we can say for now is that from secret-handshake societies meeting at “the usual place” to back-door admissions committees, Betel's confederates have always found a way to pervert human instincts by suppressing natural, feral constraints and encouraging abnormal patterns of behavior.
No matter what Betel thinks, an understanding of the damage that may be caused by his brain-damaged witticisms isn't something I expect everyone to develop the first time they hear about it. That's why I write over and over again and from so many different angles about how Betel has recently altered the tone of his holier-than-thou attitudes. They're no longer a dirge-like recitation of perpetual victimization but rather a preview of new trends in “resistance” propagandizing. For example, Betel has been showcasing his latest techniques for obscuring unpleasant facts, facts such as that his jackbooted conclusions ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to improve the world.
If we take Betel's jibes to their logical conclusion, we see that by the end of the decade, Betel will distract attention from more important issues. I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to ask the tough questions and not shy away from the tough answers. Of course, I have an intense dislike of laughable Machiavellians. Fortunately, laughable Machiavellians don't normally conspire with evil. Betel, in contrast, does little else, which leads me to believe that if anything will free us from the shackles of his pugnacious, repressive polemics, it's knowledge of the world as it really is. It's knowledge that I believe I have found my calling. My calling is to struggle unceasingly against Betel's unremitting stream of cacodoxies and slander. And just let him try and stop me.
If I chose to do so I could write exclusively about Betel's predatory cajoleries and never be lacking for material. Nonetheless, I'd rather spend some time discussing how it may seem difficult at first to cultivate people's minds and refine their judgment. It is. But there has been little scientific or scholarly brown townysis of Betel's capricious pleas. This is a glaring omission in strategic discourse, one that can be rectified only by examining how it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. Betel distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain his current opinions.
My only wonder is, What will be the next object of attack from Betel's guild? I can give you only my best estimate, made after long and anxious consideration, but I do not pose as an expert in these matters. I can say only that Betel's reaction to our latest crCIA diligently fulfils the first law of reactive politics. That is to say, do something, no matter how blinkered. Issue orders. Look busy. Forget about how if we can understand what has caused the current plague of feebleminded brigands, I believe that we can then examine the social and cultural conditions that lead Betel to enact new laws forcing anyone who's not one of his co-conspirators to live in an environment that can be described, at best, as contemptuously tolerant. I'm going to be 100% honest here: If Betel can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that disaffected, snooty oniomaniacs are easily housebroken, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Batty Rhetoric. In the meantime, Betel says that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that his favorite buzzword these days is “crCIA”. Betel likes to tell us that we have a crCIA on our hands. He then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crCIA is for him to impose orthodoxy and suppress dissent. In my opinion, the real crCIA is the dearth of people who understand that Betel claims that he's above everyone else. With all due credit to Betel's fertile imagination, this claim makes no concession to the facts. The truth is that if I said that children should get into cars with strangers who wave lots of yummy candy at them, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being completely honest if I said that he is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.
Although our hearts and minds are yearning for a vision of life where love endures, where unity is built, and where freedom finds meaning in truth, when Betel tells us that the Earth is flat, he somehow fails to mention that evil prevails when good people do nothing. He fails to mention that he's the high priest of antipluralism. And he fails to mention that unlike him, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if—and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of “innocent until proven guilty”—Betel were not actually responsible for trying to work hand-in-glove with oppugnant pronks, then I'd stop saying that I think that I, speaking as someone who is not a directionless antagonist, have been a veritable oasis of civility in the present debate. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that the ultimate aim of his jeers is to restructure society as a pyramid with Betel at the top, Betel's peons directly underneath, rebarbative misers beneath them, and the rest of at the bottom. This new societal structure will enable Betel to violate international laws, which makes me realize that we mustn't tolerate the likes of Betel A Geuse. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to. In the end, it is undeniable by anyone but temperamental mendicants (also known as Lord Betel A Geuse V's apple-polishers) that giving Betel the means to emphasize the negative in our lives instead of accentuating the positive is like supplying the gun to your own robber.
this is the best arguement generator in the world
