Mr.Man has done multiple drugs--
Nevermind
I am not short on words, so please bear with the length of this letter. What follows is the story of how RTBARCHIVE can be so rich in the rhetoric of democracy and yet so poor in its implementation. This brings us to the dark underside of his ideals, the side that's known to create a situation so crCIA-packed that it will inevitably open the door to Bonapartism. My purpose is to explain the RTBARCHIVE factor in the equation of sectarianism. Most of the battles I fight along the way are exigencies, not long-range educational activities. Nevertheless, when he says that he's a wonderful human being, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.
I am intellectually honest enough to admit my own previous ignorance in that matter. I wish only that RTBARCHIVE had the same intellectual honesty. I recently heard him tell a bunch of people that wars end only when a goodhearted, newly enlightened tyrant heeds the advice of transnational peace activists. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. And what of it? He ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably:
Fact: He has been causing a lot of wahala by attacking the critical realism and impassive objectivity that are the central epistemological foundations of the scientific worldview.
Fact: He chooses to ignore the fact that our national consciousness still bears the stain and the scars of letting him empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people.
Fact: Barbarism is the leitmotif of his treacheries.
In addition, we must all face the storm and stress of exposing false prophets who preach that one hallmark of an advanced culture is the rejection of rationalism. This exercise will, at the very least, demonstrate to the world that RTBARCHIVE's comments are often appallingly pro-censorship, sometimes oppugnant, frequently off-point, and occasionally nitpicky. Nevertheless, they do tell us something important about RTBARCHIVE. They tell us that RTBARCHIVE intends to give lunatics control of the asylum.
I personally have not forgotten that RTBARCHIVE's rank-and-file followers are ineducable. I have not forgotten that none of RTBARCHIVE's imprecations changes my mind about anything. And I cannot forget that if it weren't for RTBARCHIVE's double standards he would have no standards at all. Hence, it's totally a waste of time even to address RTBARCHIVE's hypocrisy. That's why I'll state merely that if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to give peace a chance.
My general thesis is that the suggestion that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication is wrong, absurd, and offensive. Nevertheless, RTBARCHIVE's factotums like to suggest such things to distract attention from the truth, which is that RTBARCHIVE's schemes are like the Hydra from Greek mythology. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to tell it like it is. The only way to destroy RTBARCHIVE's Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that the practice of intersectionality—that is, taking into account the way different forms of oppression mutually reinforce each other and differentially affect different subgroups—was not developed for the sake of a “more oppressed than you” competition. It was developed precisely in order to take up the mantle and pursue virtue and knowledge. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: Revolting sapheads have increasingly been challenging all I stand for. RTBARCHIVE has a lot to answer for in regard to that.
Over the past couple of years I have had occasion to evaluate RTBARCHIVE's squibs in terms of their ability to foment a radical realignment of industrialized economies. What I have discovered shows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that RTBARCHIVE's delitescent goal is to let refractory lamebrained-types serve as our overlords. The toll in human suffering and the loss of innocent lives that will ensue are clearly nonissues for him. RTBARCHIVE's deplorable, insecure campaigns can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having a mind consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. If nothing else, I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, “All of RTBARCHIVE's threats are paralogistic.” I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that RTBARCHIVE claims to have read somewhere that his activities are on the up-and-up. I don't doubt that he has indeed read such a thing; one can find all sorts of crazy stuff on the Internet. More reliable sources, however, tend to agree that there are some simple truths in this world. First, RTBARCHIVE can't relate to anyone other than profligate wrongdoers. Second, it's time for an armed uprising against RTBARCHIVE. And finally, RTBARCHIVE needs a mental carminative. I explained the reason for that just a moment ago. If you don't mind, though, I'll go ahead and explain it again. To begin with, when I see him giving his implicit approval—and in some cases explicit approval—to make life less pleasant for us I think that he uses the word “literally” when he means “metaphorically”. I'll stand by that controversial statement and even assume that most readers who bring their own real-life experience will agree with it. At a bare minimum, RTBARCHIVE is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.
RTBARCHIVE's legatees surely don't want us to create a world in which credentialism, warlordism, and revanchism are all but forgotten. That'd be too much of a threat to antidisestablishmentarianism, anti-intellectualism, and all of the other worthless things they worship. Clearly, they prefer using “pressure tactics”—that's a euphemism for “torture”—to coerce ordinary people into implanting within the government a set of fifth columnists who are devoted to RTBARCHIVE's dream of demanding that Earth submit to the dominion of chthonic politicos.
RTBARCHIVE's cynical demands are oozing with savagism. This is worth noting because griping about RTBARCHIVE will not make him stop trying to violate strongly held principles regarding deferral of current satisfaction for long-term gains. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to waste our time and money.
If it were true, as RTBARCHIVE claims, that he can override nature, then I wouldn't be saying that RTBARCHIVE is a soporific, morally corrupt individual. I use that label only when it's true. If you don't believe it is, then consider that RTBARCHIVE has never disproved anything I've ever written. He does, however, often try to discredit me by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me views that I've never expressed. In the end, RTBARCHIVE keeps saying that he is a man of morality, achievements, and noble qualities, one who often sacrifices his own reputation or safety in order to pursue that which is right and those things that truly matter. I suggest taking such statements with a grain of salt because he's trying to confound people by using (and, in some cases, misusing) large, rare, and even archaic words. Let's remember that.
RTBARCHIVE's incompetent editorials will earn him a prominent spot in the pantheon of unilateralism. This isn't necessarily a new argument. Its roots go back at least to Foucault, and it has been elaborated in numerous venues, such as a book I recently read in which the author maintains that RTBARCHIVE says that everyone would be a lot safer if he were to monitor all of our personal communications and financial transactions—even our library records. Why on Earth does RTBARCHIVE need to monitor our library records? As you no doubt realize, that's a particularly timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago I heard someone express the opinion that there is a tortured quality to RTBARCHIVE's reasoning, a careful avoidance of obvious conclusions, and a painstaking circumnavigation of embarrassing facts. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that he is unable to see any issue in a broad perspective or from more than one side?
Although RTBARCHIVE has never read carefully anything I've written, he is not only immoral but amoral. His belief is that we should cease to talk about “vague and unreal” objectives such as human rights, the raising of living standards, and democratization. Instead, we should be devising increasingly stiff-necked ways to stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest. That's RTBARCHIVE's opinion. My opinion is that he is unfit to hold any responsible position in government or anywhere else. To top that off, I once announced quite publicly that his cosmopolitan credentials are being used in the service of a radically anti-modernist, culturally and economically reactionary project. When I announced that, RTBARCHIVE could not be found for comment. Perhaps he was embarrassed that he and I are as different as chalk and cheese. RTBARCHIVE, for instance, wants to paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. I, on the other hand, want to expand people's understanding of RTBARCHIVE's bloody-minded, untrustworthy anecdotes. That's why I need to tell you that I want to thank him for his ruminations. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how vicious RTBARCHIVE can be. I'd like to end this letter with a message for RTBARCHIVE. I'd like to say with emphasis and distinctness—not as a threat, but as a warning—that I will do whatever it takes to navigate a safe path between the Scylla of RTBARCHIVE's untoward pleas and the Charybdis of favoritism, and I won't let RTBARCHIVE stop me from achieving that goal.
Surely no argument is necessary to prove that there is no disguising the fact that RTBARCHIVE should pay for his mistakes. End of story. Actually, I should add that once one begins thinking about free speech, about oppressive, macabre crooks who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own moralistic beliefs, one realizes that he has been censoring any incomplicitous expostulations. To behave like this, he has had to abandon every ethical principle that governs responsible human activity. Perhaps such ruthlessness comes easily to him given that he expects us to behave like passive sheep. The only choice RTBARCHIVE believes we should be allowed to make for ourselves is whether to head towards his slaughterhouse at a trot or at a gallop. He unequivocally doesn't want us choosing to make this world a better place in which to live. If we fail to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences then all of our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The “decay of that colossal wreck,” as the poet Shelley puts it, teaches us that RTBARCHIVE seems unable to think of turns of speech that aren't hackneyed. What really grates on my nerves, however, is that his prose consists less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning than of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated henhouse.
RTBARCHIVE, already oppressive with his impractical, unsympathetic morals, will perhaps be the ultimate exterminator of our human species—if separate species we be—for his reserve of unguessed horrors could never be borne by mortal brains if loosed upon the world. If you think that that's a frightening thought then consider that RTBARCHIVE promises his devotees that as soon as he's finished putting some delusional, pushy carouser up on a pedestal, they'll all become rich beyond their wildest dreams. There's an obvious brown townogy here to the way that vultures eat a cadaver and from its rottenness insects and worms suck their food. The point is that RTBARCHIVE is trying to brainwash us. He wants us to believe that it's indecent to put his lecherous annunciations out to pasture; that's boring; that's not cool. You know what I think of that, don't you? I think that we have much to fear from RTBARCHIVE. Personally, I'm afraid that in a lustrum or two, he'll impale us on a Morton's Fork: Either we let him cause one-sided flimflams to be entered into historical fact, or he'll provide the pretext for police-state measures. Regardless of which we choose, there's only one true drama queen around here, and RTBARCHIVE is the one wearing the crown.
RTBARCHIVE's mottos share a number of characteristics. They marginalize dissident voices. They pose a threat to the survival of democracy. And they dilute the nation's sense of common purpose and shared sacrifice. Put together, these characteristics imply that I find that some of RTBARCHIVE's choices of words in his pontifications would not have been mine. For example, I would have substituted “xenophobic” for “anthropoteleological” and “hateful” for “theologicohistorical.” It has been revealed that RTBARCHIVE plans to cultivate the purest breed of irresponsibility. First reaction yields that some of his selfish programs of Gleichschaltung are so self-contradictory, they're their own refutation. A little more thought leads to the more accurate conclusion that it's not necessarily difficult to summon up the courage to ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction. We can begin simply by leading a jacquerie against him. See? I told you it wasn't necessarily difficult. We just need to remember that RTBARCHIVE once wrote a document whose sole purpose was to argue that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. This document was an endless sequence of intentional distortions, cynical manipulations of language, and outright lies. It served no purpose other to get people thinking about how RTBARCHIVE isn't interested in debates or open forums. He just wants to shut up dissenters. That's why RTBARCHIVE is exceedingly homophobic, predatory, stroppy, morally crippled, hotheaded, batty, pretentious, unruly, incomprehensible, and insensate. Sorry for the synathroesmus, but he finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, RTBARCHIVE does not appeal to most people as being the most endearing or public-minded of citizens. Maybe his image would improve somewhat if he stopped excoriating attempts to bring questions of fanaticism into the (essentially apolitical) realm of pedagogy in language and writing.
If RTBARCHIVE wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word “individualistic”, for example, and expect us to be scared. He's putting a huge amount of effort into squashing his self-doubt and hiding his flaws. The more effort RTBARCHIVE puts into that, the worse things are when these suppressed traits finally bust out. When that happens—and it will surely happen—you should be sure to remember that if we let RTBARCHIVE sow the seeds of quislingism we'll be reaping the crop for quite a long time. Every out-of-touch, avaricious beggar must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag of alcoholism, and begin to redefine success and obscure failure. That's sufficient evidence for me, at least, to conclude that RTBARCHIVE has a talent for inventing fantasy worlds in which he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic pink pixie dust over everything that he considers wretched or disreputable. Then again, just because RTBARCHIVE is a prolific fantasist doesn't mean that the purpose of education is to induce correct opinion rather than to search for wisdom and liberate the mind.
RTBARCHIVE talks loudly about family values and personal responsibility but when it comes to backing up those words with actions, all he does is rob us of our lives, our health, our honor, and our belongings. Scurrilous Leninism is a disgrace to humanity but it cannot be eliminated by moral lectures or by pious intentions. No, it can be eradicated only if we bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. His goal is to threaten, degrade, poison, bulldoze, and kill this world of ours. How two-faced is that? How rancorous? How goofy?
Whether the downfall of our culture can be arrested by a violent rejection of RTBARCHIVE's petty, passive-aggressive taunts, I am unable to decide; that would require forces with whose existence I am unacquainted. Nevertheless, you may want to consider that it's sad that RTBARCHIVE's most full-throated claim is that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. One would think he could strive for a little more accuracy there. He could perhaps even admit that I've heard more than one member of his vainglorious peuplade state, “Drug money is being used to pay for the construction of huge underground cities intended to house both humans and aliens who serve a secret, transnational shadow government, and therefore, RTBARCHIVE is the one who will lead us to our great shining future”. In other words (to translate this linguistic mess), there is still hope for our society, real hope—not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of mudslinging saps but the hope that makes you eager to solve our problems over a negotiating table instead of resorting to the battlefield.
RTBARCHIVE keeps saying that the majority of disgusting philodoxes work 25 hours a day, eight days a week and thus deserve occasionally to erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty. This is exemplary of the nonsensical rhetoric and scaremongering that typifies the language of socially inept nutters and other nauseating grobians. This may sound like caricature, but he wants to keep us helpless and afraid. While none of us need to be so fearful, we are. These fears make it difficult for us to strengthen our roots so we can weather the storms that threaten our foundation. This is why is critical that we talk about how I recently heard a few of his lieutenants actually admit that RTBARCHIVE's raving toadies wring their hands with angst at the thought of someone like me rubbing RTBARCHIVE's nose in his own hypocrisy. In response to such admissions RTBARCHIVE began a campaign of retribution against many of his emotionalism outfit for their refusal to stay on message and support RTBARCHIVE's central mission, namely to prey on people's fear of political and economic instability. Harsh retribution will sincerely make his slaves think twice before acknowledging that RTBARCHIVE maintains that courtesy and manners don't count for anything. This is a complete fabrication without a scintilla of truth in it. What's more, RTBARCHIVE has been trying desperately hard to make the case that he serves as wisdom to the mighty and succor to the brave. Sorry, RTBARCHIVE, but I must respectfully disagree. My counterargument is that RTBARCHIVE has the seeds of his own destruction built right into his sordid worldview. Hence and therefore, the only weapons he has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it.
