Author Topic: starfishs who walk around with huge guns  (Read 7616 times)

okay shut the forget up and listen.
i dont give a forget if you were joking or not about me being tribal
but i know for a loving fact that black men are targeted way more than any other race besides muslims
and ive seen stuff like black men being targeted happen
and you can't even tell me its not true because i know for a fact it is
so please forget off and check yourself before you wreck yourself
tha po-lice is bein tribal he a good boy

tha po-lice is bein tribal he a good boy

Nice ninja, anyway,

okay shut the forget up and listen.
i dont give a forget if you were joking or not about me being tribal
but i know for a loving fact that black men are targeted way more than any other race besides muslims
and ive seen stuff like black men being targeted happen
and you can't even tell me its not true because i know for a fact it is
so please forget off and check yourself before you wreck yourself

You just keep digging yourself deeper into a hole.

Your post was nonsensical and made to stir up stuff at best. Saying that just because a person is black and they have a gun automatically means they're guaranteed be shot is one of the most ridiculous claims I've ever heard.

Don't be so hostile.
Watch this for evidence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKGZnB41_e4&feature=youtu.be&t=25s

He didn't say it was guaranteed. He said it happened in general.

He didn't say it was guaranteed. He said it happened in general.
He said, and I quote:
"the police would shoot him on sight, even if he wasnt pointing it at anybody."

If he meant differently then he should have said so.

This isn't something you'd see every day. :o

ok come back when you actually know what you're talking about
There is no such thing an "assault rifle". Every weapon made is made to cause destruction. So you could probably slap the term "assault" onto any weapon or item you want that's capable of causing damage, and it'll make sense. Maybe we should ban "assault vehicles", such as those DEADLY SUV's that kill so many innocent people every year!!!!! You can easily say that anything and everything is an "assault weapon".

There are no legal or official firearm-manufacturing definitions for what constitutes an "assault rifle". The only definitions you will find will come from left-wing media sources that are against the 2nd amendment, and in most cases, are also against many of our other freedoms that we are guaranteed by the Constitution. See also the huge loss of freedom of speech we're experiencing across the country because "what you say could be OFFENSIVE to others!!!"
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 06:27:24 PM by Planr »

Your post was nonsensical and made to stir up stuff at best. Saying that just because a person is black and they have a gun automatically means they're guaranteed be shot is one of the most ridiculous claims I've ever heard.

Don't be so hostile.

stir up stuff? i was actually trying to say what i wanted to say straight up

You just keep digging yourself deeper into a hole.

im not in a hole. if you're inferring that im making a mess in every topic, why don't you just make a drama about me? hows that deep for you? cuz i honestly dont giveaforget

There is no such thing an "assault rifle". Every weapon made is made to cause destruction. So you could probably slap the term "assault" onto any weapon or item you want that's capable of causing damage, and it'll make sense. Maybe we should ban "assault vehicles", such as those DEADLY SUV's that kill so many innocent people every year!!!!!

There are no legal or official firearm-manufacturing definitions for what constitutes an "assault rifle". The only definitions you will find will come from left-wing media sources that are against the 2nd amendment, and in most cases, are also against many of our other freedoms that we are guaranteed by the Constitution. See also the huge loss of freedom of speech we're experiencing across the country because "what you say could be OFFENSIVE to others!!!"

An assault rifle is a selective fire rifle that uses an intermediate cartridge and a detachable magazine.[1] Assault rifles are currently the standard service rifles in most modern armies. Examples of assault rifles include the StG 44, AK-47 and the M16 rifle.

The Germans were the first to pioneer the assault rifle concept, during World War II, based upon research that showed that most firefights happen within 400 metres (1,300 ft) and that contemporary rifles were over-powered for most small arms combat.[2][3][4][5][6] They sought to develop a select-fire intermediate powered rifle combining the firepower of a submachine gun with the accuracy and range of a rifle.[2][3][4][5][6] This was done by shortening the standard 7.92×57mm cartridge to 7.92×33mm and giving it a lighter 125 grain bullet, that limited range but allowed for more controllable automatic fire.[3][4][5][6][7] A smaller lighter cartridge also allowed soldiers to carry more ammunition "to support the higher consumption rate of automatic fire."[2]

The result was the Sturmgewehr 44, which the Germans produced in large numbers; approximately half-a-million were made.[3][4][5][6] Unlike previous rifle designs it introduced an over-the-barrel gas system, straight stock and pistol grip to reduce recoil and improve handling characteristics.[2] "The principle of this weapon...was probably the most important advance in small arms since the invention of smokeless powder."







legal or official? nah

still, there is an unofficially official definition and every gun owner who isn't a complete handicap knows what is and isn't an AR
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 06:35:25 PM by Juncoph »

There is no such thing an "assault rifle". Every weapon made is made to cause destruction. So you could probably slap the term "assault" onto any weapon or item you want that's capable of causing damage, and it'll make sense. Maybe we should ban "assault vehicles", such as those DEADLY SUV's that kill so many innocent people every year!!!!! You can easily say that anything and everything is an "assault weapon".
are you saying that weapons designed to kill shouldn't have assault on them because that just pushes the fact that they kill you?
newsflash moron: guns do that, what else do they do

No, guns don't kill people. Velocity does.

There is no such thing an "assault rifle". Every weapon made is made to cause destruction. So you could probably slap the term "assault" onto any weapon or item you want that's capable of causing damage, and it'll make sense. Maybe we should ban "assault vehicles", such as those DEADLY SUV's that kill so many innocent people every year!!!!! You can easily say that anything and everything is an "assault weapon".
are you seriously trying to demean the very definition of the term "assault rifle"

it's called an assault rifle because it fulfills a very specific role intended with its name, hence why its prefix cannot be copypasted onto other mediums like you're attempting to do (at least not while retaining the same meaning)

There is no such thing an "assault rifle". Every weapon made is made to cause destruction. So you could probably slap the term "assault" onto any weapon or item you want that's capable of causing damage, and it'll make sense. Maybe we should ban "assault vehicles", such as those DEADLY SUV's that kill so many innocent people every year!!!!! You can easily say that anything and everything is an "assault weapon".

There are no legal or official firearm-manufacturing definitions for what constitutes an "assault rifle". The only definitions you will find will come from left-wing media sources that are against the 2nd amendment, and in most cases, are also against many of our other freedoms that we are guaranteed by the Constitution. See also the huge loss of freedom of speech we're experiencing across the country because "what you say could be OFFENSIVE to others!!!"
No, assault rifle is a real firearms term used by millions of people all over the political compass and various firearms manufacturers. I recommend you stop now before you make yourself look even dumber.

In regards to the confusion on the term "Assault Rifle", what is more often than not misunderstood is that people think "assault rifles" are fully automatic weapons. This isn't necessarily true as every rifle can be used for assault. So what happens in the media is people misconstrue that term and it creates fear in people thinking there are all these men/women running around with fully automatic machine guns.

Needless to say in the very end a weapon such as a pistol/rifle used in open carry will cause fear. It's what it was designed to do. There are plenty of people who only use their guns for hunting and keep them at home and possess CONCEALED carry licenses for self defense so they don't scare the living stuff out of people.

What the man in the OP is doing is improper social etiquette and pushing a point the wrong way. The real winners are the people who exercise their rights the proper way and do it to keep the peace by keeping their personal defense weapons hidden. Very few people in an Airport of all places is going to point at that guy and say "good on him, he's exercising his rights."

While i practice open carry, i only carry a pistol and speak and act in a way that isn't threatening. You can't do that nearly as effectively with a high capacity magazine attached to a large rifle whether its on your back or sitting across your chest. This man wants to be seen, and because of that it challenges people. You DO NOT challenge people with your weapons no matter how much of a right you think you have to do it.
 
« Last Edit: June 03, 2015, 07:06:39 PM by Tayasaurus »

I am all about open carry, concealed, 2nd amendment and all but It is stupid to carry a Rifle into a Mcdonalds.

What he said.  I'm all about freedom, but people ought to handle it like adults and be discreet about it.

There is no such thing an "assault rifle". Every weapon made is made to cause destruction. So you could probably slap the term "assault" onto any weapon or item you want that's capable of causing damage, and it'll make sense. Maybe we should ban "assault vehicles", such as those DEADLY SUV's that kill so many innocent people every year!!!!! You can easily say that anything and everything is an "assault weapon".

There are no legal or official firearm-manufacturing definitions for what constitutes an "assault rifle". The only definitions you will find will come from left-wing media sources that are against the 2nd amendment, and in most cases, are also against many of our other freedoms that we are guaranteed by the Constitution. See also the huge loss of freedom of speech we're experiencing across the country because "what you say could be OFFENSIVE to others!!!"

Do you intentionally try to be the dumbest starfish to ever exist or does it just come naturally to you. Calling a medium-high capacity magazine-fed rifled weapon an "assault rifle" has no political ties. It's terminology that literally everybody who isn't paranoid about "m-muh gun control slacktivists" uses to refer to things such as the AR-15, M4, AK-47, StG-44, G36, so on and so forth because they fit the bill. I suppose next you're going to say that Call of Duty has a humongous gun control message because it uses the term assault rifle. How about "machine gun"? I mean guns are machines by definition, and obviously they're all guns. Clearly literally every single gun ever is a machine gun. Because that's what I'm registering from the forget-handicapped word vomit you've managed to spill out.