Author Topic: Swampivorous spergs out - part 1 of 10  (Read 9860 times)

i agree that not responding is a good choice for him

it's better than having a meltdown with arguments and getting banned

it's better than having a meltdown with arguments and getting banned

nothing's better than that though

All he needs to learn is to keep to himself, that would make him much more acceptable
And irrelevant references are still not funny

So where are the other 9 parts

Also: I could technically post Pokemon in the Food research thread.
find some picture of some loving stuffass lucario being coated in chocolate and post it.
...forget, I just made myself lose by mentioning Lucario.
I can't remember most of my childhood for stuff anyway.

The only thing I can remember is being raped by some kid, and then afterwards his mother beat his son in front of me to try and make me feel bad and guilt me so she wouldn't have to deal with legal troubles.

handicapius Maximus strikes again. The ride never ends.

handicapius Maximus strikes again. The ride never ends.
im confused on why this was necessary ???

handicapius Maximus strikes again. The ride never ends.

i understand the pokemon stuff but come on i was just trying to understand what his deal was lol

i understand the pokemon stuff but come on i was just trying to understand what his deal was lol

His 'deal' is that he is trying to attain attention from people for being 'forgeted up'. It's a very classic attention-whore maneuver that's practically inline with trolling.

Feigning stuff like rape and child abuse for attention and sympathy is not okay. It's a tad over the line even for this kid's standards.

His 'deal' is that he is trying to attain attention from people for being 'forgeted up'. It's a very classic attention-whore maneuver that's practically inline with trolling.

Feigning stuff like rape and child abuse for attention and sympathy is not okay. It's a tad over the line even for this kid's standards.
lol


idk it's just silly to jump to that conclusion

you never know

idk it's just silly to jump to that conclusion

you never know
edit: It's a touchy subject regardless and it's probably best to just drop it at this point

idk it's just silly to jump to that conclusion

you never know

"Mother beats child in-front of rape witness to avoid arrest"

stuff like this would make international headlines. What do you mean 'you never know'? It's got 12 year old's hyperactive imagination written all over it.

idk it's just silly to jump to that conclusion

you never know

it's not silly when there are valid reasons to reach that conclusion. He's not providing any valid details, and the story itself as is, is unbelievable as forget.

"Mother beats child in-front of rape witness to avoid arrest"

noedit: rape victim