Author Topic: Guys leave Scott alone. "Make A Difference" (Read 4543 times)

hillkill · July 31, 2015, 12:47:03 PM

well it looks like scott somehow found the rosetta stone for luring in children to buy this piece of stuff.

Ad Bot · Advertisement

Kochieboy · July 31, 2015, 12:48:36 PM

Quote from: hillkill on July 31, 2015, 12:47:03 PM

well it looks like scott somehow found the rosetta stone for luring in children to buy this piece of stuff.

Get a little bit of hate mail > Plea for sympathy > Gain the support of all your fans > Everyone is willing to bow to you > Make something garbage > Rake in the profits anyways

Blockz · July 31, 2015, 12:56:35 PM

Quote from: Refticus on July 31, 2015, 08:09:00 AM

the cash cow speaks

mooo

K3k0m@n · July 31, 2015, 01:01:22 PM

making 1 is okay, but making 4 in less than a year is loving pathetic.
I want this to be the last one. I want scott to stop caring about fnaf anymore.
fnaf has become autism and youtube bait and I'm quite sure most people want it gone

Xeidious* · July 31, 2015, 01:09:02 PM

Quote from: K3k0m@n on July 31, 2015, 01:01:22 PM

but making 4 in less than a year is loving pathetic.

i don't see why it would be pathetic i mean if that's your opinion ill have to respect it but damn.

making 4 games in a year takes some dedication, and people still overlook that to this day it seems, while yes it's been /sorta/ copy paste for all 4 games, each one was different in it's own way, mechanics, timeline, things like that. when you put aside the bad side of the fanbase, the game series isn't that bad, imo. Honestly you would have to fully look into the games to have a better grasp of them, but i don't know if anyone who dislikes it would take the time to do that?

feel free to tell me otherwise though.

hillkill · July 31, 2015, 01:09:51 PM

it takes dedication, but stuffting out that many games in less than a year means you aren't putting very much effort into them.

Xeidious* · July 31, 2015, 01:13:43 PM

Quote from: hillkill on July 31, 2015, 01:09:51 PM

it takes dedication, but stuffting out that many games in less than a year means you aren't putting very much effort into them.

not necessarily, while that could be the case for triple A game developers, small games under 10 dollars each tend to be decent, as far as i've seen. and they are pretty decently made, other than it being copy paste in the department of i don't know the style of gameplay? i really don't see any other problems with it other than the bad side of the fan-base.

The Murderous Cop · July 31, 2015, 01:27:52 PM

I think Scott's a cool guy. I mean, who else plays Megaman 3 with their children? Not many.
The fanbase, though...

SetGaming · July 31, 2015, 01:33:07 PM

Quote from: Xeidious* on July 31, 2015, 01:13:43 PM

not necessarily, while that could be the case for triple A game developers, small games under 10 dollars each tend to be decent, as far as i've seen. and they are pretty decently made, other than it being copy paste in the department of i don't know the style of gameplay? i really don't see any other problems with it other than the bad side of the fan-base.

Well, from experience in coding, and implying I'm just a beginner, the game (coding and debugging) would take less time than the art would to make. I'm not saying this makes it inherently bad, but it sure is lazy.

He could've probably pumped out all those games within 2 months if he really tried. The games take more art skill than programming skill to make.