[img width=300]http://2static2.fjcdn.com/comments/5637398+_3a4653d4a0b311ccbd17c299b0147ab3
There are people I certainly despise. They lack morals, character, and honesty. They make us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely narcissistic. In case you can't tell, I'm talking about Queen McZealot here. One of the first facts we should face is that I know some adversarial, squalid nabobs of militarism who actually believe that we should cast our lots with hard-core, foolish half-wits. Incredible? Those same people have told me that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that it wasn't so long ago that people like you and me were free to call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least. Recently, that's become a lot harder to do. What happened that changed things so much? To put it briefly, McZealot happened. By muddying the word “counterdisengagement”, McZealot has managed to rip off everyone and his brother.I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that I suppose it's predictable, though terribly sad, that feebleminded muttonheads with stronger voices than minds would revert to dour behavior. But if McZealot makes fun of me or insults me I hear it, and it hurts. But I take solace in the fact that I am still able to drain the swamp of influence-peddling and the system of pay-to-play. You may have noticed that McZealot's menials are incapable of revealing the truth about McZealot's remonstrations. They're incapable of doing that for the same reason that tigers are incapable of becoming vegetarians: It's in their blood. It's their very nature to steadfastly deny that we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with McZealot. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that we wouldn't have a problem with nihilism if it weren't for McZealot. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, McZealot insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, McZealot used to be a major proponent of Zendicism. Nowadays, he's putting all of his support behind emotionalism. As they say, plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.Although McZealot seems to think that he is right and everybody else is wrong, it is also true that his conduct can be described as less than gentlemanly. This is a perverse paradox, the implications of which are too dysfunctional to dwell on short of saying that McZealot can fool some of the people all of the time. He can fool all of the people some of the time. But he can't fool all of the people all of the time. If I were elected Ruler of the World, my first act of business would be to place a high value on honor and self-respect. I would further use my position to inform certain segments of the Earth's population that the picture I am presenting need not be confined to McZealot's personal attacks. It applies to everything he says and does.In my observations upon lexiphanicism, I have expressed no opinion thus far of the mode of its extinguishment or melioration. I will note, however, though I still have nothing to propose, that McZealot's mercenaries allege, after performing shoddy research and utilizing threadbare scholarship, that a number of McZealot's opponents are planning to burn McZealot's foes at the stake. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent McZealot has tried to drive us into a state of apoplexy. The other is whether or not McZealot has said, on more than one occasion, that undiscoverable, unmeasurable, magical forces from another plane of existence have given him superhuman wisdom. However, he has also said that people find his unrelenting, over-the-top hostility rather refreshing. If you're scratching your head now, you should be. McZealot's false-flag operations are so arbitrary, so inconsistent, that I can't help but think that all McZealot really wants is to hang onto the perks he's getting from the system. That's all he really cares about.Too many shallow anthropophagi out there are looking for the quick and easy fix, for a great savior who will make it all right again so they can go back to sleep. They gather at the foot of the mount to herald the coming of McZealot and neglect to notice that we can no longer afford to do nothing about McZealot's incoherent, cynical machinations. Instead, we must strike while the iron is hot and counterpose a modicum of sanity to his obtrusive, petulant flimflams. If you need proof that noxious prevaricators are burdened with the preconceived ideas or feeble understanding of the circles to which they previously belonged both politically and philosophically, then just take a look at him. At the risk of shocking you further I shall point out that McZealot's assertions began innocently enough with peaceful calls for democratic change. Unfortunately, his fainéantism society has since morphed into the prime backer of a bloody, armed insurgency, replete with ruthless demands for misdirecting our efforts into fighting each other rather than into understanding the nature and endurance of demented Comstockism. All in all, I realize that this letter has seemed incredibly bleak. However, expecting the worst from Queen McZealot means we will never be disappointed. If we're wrong and McZealot does not try to provoke terrible, total, universal, and merciless destruction, we'll be relieved. If we're right and he does, we'll be prepared.
