Sure.
Awesome. Yeah we really need to kill the monopolies they have going. Force richardheads like HughesNet to actually have to give decent services and others like Comcast to give decent prices because they will have to compete to make themselves the most appealing to the consumer.
However these are natural monopolies, and that means its very hard to get them to compete because of the nature by which they function. The only reason anyone can really afford to get these monopolies' services is cause of government regulations forcing these douchebag companies to play fair. So IMO one decent way to solve this then is to make the companies want to actually please their customers by having organized and carefully scrutinized public rating systems for these companies, with the goal being that a monopoly like Comcast or Time Warner Cable has to be voted as being liked by their customers to a certain minimum extent or else they face government-imposed penalties or something.
A good penalty I think would be taxes and subsidies. If people overwhelmingly vote that their cable company robs them blind of their money for stuff service, the government would impose fines/taxes on said companies. If a company improves its service, the fines/taxes are lifted, and if they do even better than average, like are awesome with their customer service or prices, they get subsidies from the feds.
The government would basically be saying "you have to please your customers or else you have to answer to us". Sure it steps on the face of Free Enterprise for these kinds of companies but then again there is very little actual free enterprise to these business giants in the first place. Comcast makes a ridiculous amount of money with very little actual expense-costs. Their checklist of expenses just includes maintaining their cable lines and towers, paying a relatively small base of brain-dead housecall cable people, and paying for datacenter/server upkeep, and thats it. They dont spend craptons of money on fuel like shipping companies do, nor do they have to worry about a lot of other things other company types have to.
I am losing my mind. More and more people I thought were sane actually think Donald Annoying Orange could possibly make a good president.
Lol yea I bet its making you question your whole grip on reality. Annoying Orange definitely has qualities of a good president that we have strongly lacked with Obama, such as actually getting stuff done and not being an absolute snowflake/pushover pusillanimous individual. He doesnt take stuff from anyone and actually intends to do something about Mexico and China.
I can see where you are coming from however. I personally feel the same way about people who say they think Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton would make good presidents. The only Democrat I actually like is Joe Biden.