espio - what

[shitlord]

In regards to Damp, Espio, and Maxx, can we just agree that they're all handicaps?

the problem with maxx is he refuses to give a stuff
i talk with him daily, excluding the last week, and i hate saying this not in front of him because it seems like im talking behind his back
whenever he gets caught in something he refuses to give a stuff
if he gets caught in acting like an idiot and splerging he says "nah bro im not mad does this sound mad to you" then keeps going off
he needs to drop the "yeah bro who cares" attitude
he  does  not  care that hes acting stupid so he refuses to acknowledge that hes acting stupid

[Ad Bot]

[Satan From Wreck-It-Ralph]

espio burnt my shake

[spideykong]

no it wasn't, it was actually very well within boundaries of being believe-able. you can see he lacks the motor skills to hit each button correctly but also doesn't give enough of a stuff to fix the typos

i read through it and the story checks out. this is an incredibly generic first timer experience

You're joking right

[Rally]

You're joking right

No I'm making a pretty reasonable claim with a reasonable amount of evidence and a reasonable amount of experience with the subject. Whereas you're just talking out your ass to stuff on a user with a bad rep because you know it's safe.

[spideykong]

No I'm making a pretty reasonable claim with a reasonable amount of evidence and a reasonable amount of experience with the subject. Whereas you're just talking out your ass to stuff on a user with a bad rep because you know it's safe.

I have a ton of older friends and have talked to them while they're drinking, their typing is a little forgeted by it's not basically incomprehensible gibberish like what espio was doing. Stop assuming.

[sir dooble]

I have a ton of older friends and have talked to them while they're drinking, their typing is a little forgeted by it's not basically incomprehensible gibberish like what espio was doing. Stop assuming.

Drinking, or drunk? There's no one reaction to drinking, it depends on how much they've had and the person drinking.

[Rally]

I have a ton of older friends and have talked to them while they're drinking, their typing is a little forgeted by it's not basically incomprehensible gibberish like what espio was doing. Stop assuming.

I'm not assuming. I've drunk texted people before and I know what's fake and what's real. You very clearly don't, it's something you have to experience before you understand. Chances are your 'older friends' are not first timers, like espio. And it was hardly 'incomprehensible gibberish', forget outta here with that weak ass stuff, it was practically just a few spelling errors in a run-on sentence.

[Glass Joe]

They are a triumvirate of handicapancy.

Maxx McGee of the handicap Three

[spideykong]

Drinking, or drunk? There's no one reaction to drinking, it depends on how much they've had and the person drinking.

He was pretty stufffaced, we were on a tinychat

[spideykong]

I'm not assuming. I've drunk texted people before and I know what's fake and what's real. You very clearly don't, it's something you have to experience before you understand.

Chances are your 'older friends' are not first timers, like espio. And it was hardly 'incomprehensible gibberish', forget outta here with that weak ass stuff, it was practically just a few spelling errors in a run-on sentence.

Yes, you are assuming. I have experienced plenty, I have online friends who drink and have talked to my dad on several occasions when he had been pretty wasted over the phone, and over text too. Again, stop assuming.
 
There wasn't any proof to anything that espio did, it's really easy to 'act' wasted on the internet. You realize 80 percent of people in OP's thread that he linked were calling espio a bullstuffter right?

[Rally]

I guess I've been playing a lot of devils advocate recently so I'll just drop this for some context: Personally I don't really care about Espio, he should be banned for posting under the influence which is against the rules of pretty much every forum except this one. But the amount of pretentious judgmental bullstuff going on here is ridiculous.

Yes, you are assuming. I have experienced plenty, I have online friends who drink and have talked to my dad on several occasions when he had been pretty wasted over the phone, and over text too. Again, stop assuming.
 

When I said "experience" I meant having been drunk yourself. Your dad and your friends are not Espio. The situations you are talking about did not reflect Espio's. This is not an assumption, this is a logical deduction. You don't know what you're talking about because you do not have experience with drunk texting.

How do you reckon you're going to explain to me the difference between someone who's faking drunk texting and someone who is actually drunk texting when I have had personal experience with drunk texting and your only experience is your internet friends and your adult father? Everyone has a different personality when they are drunk, and drunk texting differs from person to person and is influenced HIGHLY by this drunk personality, as well as experience with alcohol, age, ect.

There wasn't any proof to anything that espio did, it's really easy to 'act' wasted on the internet. You realize 80 percent of people in OP's thread that he linked were calling espio a bullstuffter right?

80% of the people in that thread were also expressing their irrational terror of having alcohol anywhere near their circulation system. I somehow doubt these people know what the forget they are talking about. 80% of the people in that thread were stuffting on Espio because they know he has a bad rep and they figure they can get away with stuffting on someone for a daily e-peen stroke. Just because 80% of people are wrong does not give you the right to be wrong as well. I don't know if you've noticed but 80% of the people on this forum have a tenancy to be loving stupid. Try not to fit in with them.

I don't see how the burden of proof is on Espio in this situation. You're the one making the claim. Espio doesn't need to prove stuff to you, and if you're gonna sit there and bitch him out, it's your job to back up the claim you're making. If it's so easy to act wasted on the internet, why are you so sure he's lying?

[spideykong]

I guess I've been playing a lot of devils advocate recently so I'll just drop this for some context: Personally I don't really care about Espio, he should be banned for posting under the influence which is against the rules of pretty much every forum except this one. But the amount of pretentious judgmental bullstuff going on here is ridiculous.

When I said "experience" I meant having been drunk yourself. Your dad and your friends are not Espio. The situations you are talking about did not reflect Espio's. This is not an assumption, this is a logical deduction. You don't know what you're talking about because you do not have experience with drunk texting.

How do you reckon you're going to explain to me the difference between someone who's faking drunk texting and someone who is actually drunk texting when I have had personal experience with drunk texting and your only experience is your internet friends and your adult father? Everyone has a different personality when they are drunk, and drunk texting differs from person to person and is influenced HIGHLY by this drunk personality, as well as experience with alcohol, age, ect.

80% of the people in that thread were also expressing their irrational terror of having alcohol anywhere near their circulation system. I somehow doubt these people know what the forget they are talking about. 80% of the people in that thread were stuffting on Espio because they know he has a bad rep and they figure they can get away with stuffting on someone for a daily e-peen stroke. Just because 80% of people are wrong does not give you the right to be wrong as well. I don't know if you've noticed but 80% of the people on this forum have a tenancy to be loving stupid. Try not to fit in with them.

I don't see how the burden of proof is on Espio in this situation. You're the one making the claim. Espio doesn't need to prove stuff to you, and if you're gonna sit there and bitch him out, it's your job to back up the claim you're making. If it's so easy to act wasted on the internet, why are you so sure he's lying?

Wait, so my experiences have no signifigance but for some reason yours do? How does that make any sense? You're ridiculous lol.

It's not the burden of proof, I'm assuming he's lying. I don't need to prove an assumption. If it bothered him that people think hes bullstuffting, he'd prove it.

[IkeTheGeneric]

it's pretty much on him for logging on a forum while stufffaced if he isn't bullstuffting (which is a definite probability)

kids, if you can't hold your liquor than don't broadcast your drunken stupor

[Rally]

Wait, so my experiences have no signifigance but for some reason yours do? How does that make any sense? You're ridiculous lol.

Your experiences have no significance because they're completely irrelevant and you have no idea what you're talking about because you have 0 personal experience with the topic at hand. You're stupid lol.

It's not the burden of proof, I'm assuming he's lying. I don't need to prove an assumption. If it bothered him that people think hes bullstuffting, he'd prove it.

How the forget you gonna prove you were drunk last night to a forum of anonymous internet strangers? His story is 100% believable and there's no reason to not believe it. It's not like some over-the-top bullstuff like when Damp pretended to hold 15 teenagers hostage. The dude drank some liquor with a few buds, watched anime, woke up the next morning and took a pretty gnarly stuff. That's it. That's like my average Friday night. Why would anyone lie about that, I don't get it, what could anyone possibly gain from that? Could he be lying? Yeah. It's about as possible as you lying about having friends online who drunk message you. Or the fact that you have friends in general.

What about this story makes it unbelievable? Can you tell me exactly what it was about the 9 minor typos in his drunk post that prove he was lying? You can't just go into a thread and stuff out an accusation and then say "i don't have to prove my point you have to prove it wrong", that's bullstuff.

Also:

stop assuming

I'm assuming

tf homie?

[spideykong]

I literally explained my experiences with you, interacting with my father when he's drunk is pretty personal imo, how are they irrelevant? You said I have no experience, I explained how I do. This is irrelevant? What?

That last point makes no sense because neither of those statements even correlate. One was me telling you to stop assuring I have no experience, the other one was me assuming hes a liar. Nice flawless argument. /sarcasm

What's with this 'brother' and 'homie' stuff you're tossing around? Are you emphasizing you're a brainless ape?