should I buy these

[Col. Derontchi]

New Balances used to be stuff but they've stepped their game up.

[Ad Bot]

[#Jeetlor]

My J's were $60

[Lurker]

New Balances used to be stuff but they've stepped their game up.

Too bad they're still stuff. Nike all the way.

[Col. Derontchi]

Too bad they're still stuff. Nike all the way.

Nikes have actually kinda sucked ass lately. The 5.0s are a good example. They look good but extremely low quality.

[Lurker]

Nikes have actually kinda sucked ass lately. The 5.0s are a good example. They look good but extremely low quality.

that's the reason why i like nike

all of the sports brands are stuff anyways so why not go with the ones with good design?

[Col. Derontchi]

that's the reason why i like nike

all of the sports brands are stuff anyways so why not go with the ones with good design?

Because I bought some 5.0's and the colors quickly became stuff and ugly and the shoe isn't really that comfortable. They only look good while they're brand new. Adidas seems to be doing alright.

[Planr]

i only spend around $70 tops for my shoes. i always have only one or two pairs, and i replace them every year.

my deal is that shoes are meant to get dirty. i dont want to spend extra money on a pair of shoes because "they look nicer" or whatever when theyre only gonna be worn by me for a year and i'm probably gonna really wear em out by the time to get new shoes anyway. do you have any idea what kind of nasty crap is on the ground that can get on your shoe. its stupid from an economic standpoint to fork over hundreds of dollars for a pair of shoes that, chances are, are going to get ruined by mud, tar, rain, wet sand, dirt, gum, bug guts, dog poop, and a variety of other filthy things. maybe if you live in the inner city somewhere it isnt much of a deal though.

[Lurker]

Because I bought some 5.0's and the colors quickly became stuff and ugly and the shoe isn't really that comfortable. They only look good while they're brand new. Adidas seems to be doing alright.

u fell into their marketing

adidas nike and new balance all have stuff quality when it comes to their footwear

[Daswiruch]

my deal is that shoes are meant to get dirty. i dont want to spend extra money on a pair of shoes because "they look nicer" or whatever when theyre only gonna be worn by me for a year and i'm probably gonna really wear em out by the time to get new shoes anyway. do you have any idea what kind of nasty crap is on the ground that can get on your shoe. its stupid from an economic standpoint to fork over hundreds of dollars for a pair of shoes that, chances are, are going to get ruined by mud, tar, rain, wet sand, dirt, gum, bug guts, dog poop, and a variety of other filthy things. maybe if you live in the inner city somewhere it isnt much of a deal though.

i agree with this 160%

[sir dooble]

It's illegal to wear light up shoes over the age of 7.

[Machaty]

I mean they look like stuff

[Nonnel]

There are perfectly good looking and wearing shoes for like ~$40 cheaper than those
They also won't make you look like a jackass

[Mr.Noßody]

If they didn't look like stuff I'd say good for it,

But they look like stuff...

[Xealyth]

i would never personally buy shoes for more than 60-70
they would be too nice to wear outside

[Niff]

Ew no.