Author Topic: war on the middle east  (Read 7743 times)

Idk I mean they are trying to take the Holy City of Jerusalem so those filthy muslims will burn
We'll give you Annoying Orange and he'll build you guys a wall

lets just nuke all those damn towelheadssarcasm

We'll give you Annoying Orange and he'll build you guys a wall
If he builds a wall how will we take the city back? It makes it that much harder to besiege!
lets just nuke all those damn towelheadssarcasm
Watch what you say bud. The faux moral outrage on this forum is insane.

Watch what you say bud. The faux moral outrage on this forum is insane.
trust me, 90% of it is real moral outrage. most people do not think like you thank god

trust me, 90% of it is real moral outrage. most people do not think like you thank god
I went back and corrected my statement once I had cooled down. I do not preach genocide of loving muslims. The reason I call it "faux" is because it is only muslims, typically.

The faux moral outrage on this forum is insane.
what kind of crazy mindset do you have to be in to legitimately believe that people who disagree with you are just pretending
I went back and corrected my statement once I had cooled down. I do not preach genocide of loving muslims. The reason I call it "faux" is because it is only muslims, typically.
what are you even talking about. what statement do you mean?

The reason I call it "faux" is because it is only muslims, typically.
I don't understand how that applies to muslims at all. you used faux to refer to the moral outrage, not muslims

We should have hump n' dumped



Get in there, forget sadam, and get out

how else are we suppose to procure oil

what kind of crazy mindset do you have to be in to legitimately believe that people who disagree with you are just pretending
what are you even talking about. what statement do you mean?
Oh, awhile back, I snapped a little bit and posted something irrational. Although I corrected myself quickly, people still hold me to the original statement. I say it's faux because it is a common trend among a certain group of people to "defend" Islam, but don't really give much of a stuff typically.

I say it's faux because it is a common trend among a certain group of people to "defend" Islam, but don't really give much of a stuff typically.
listen you can't be all controversial and then say stuff like "a certain group of people", just say what's in your heart and deal with the collateral.

We should have hump n' dumped



Get in there, forget sadam, and get out
and what good would that have done? the country would be in the same forgeted circumstance with maybe a few less of our freedom boys in the ground.

and what good would that have done? the country would be in the same forgeted circumstance with maybe a few less of our freedom boys in the ground.
We wouldn't have stayed there costing large amounts of money. Plus what good would it do to stay in a country that's always going to have issues.


We should'a took the oil and left

listen you can't be all controversial and then say stuff like "a certain group of people", just say what's in your heart and deal with the collateral.
Progressives. I mean progressives. Let me just clear it up now that I don't believe each progressive person is this way. It just happens to be progressives that do this. Also typically atheist, which I will explain in a second. My personal theory is that they defend them because the right-wing media demonizes them, but that's really the only reason. They have become "persecuted" even though I think the general majority of people do not reflect the mindset of the right. They do not actually care about muslims, they care about persecuted minorities. My "evidence" for this is that (here's where the atheism part comes into play) I have seen the same person wish similar things upon Christians to the person that they lashed out at for saying about Muslims.

I cannot stress enough that I do not think it is a majority of progressives that think this way, nor atheists, nor right-wingers. I do not wish to start any kind of religious debate, only that of my words if necessary.

We wouldn't have stayed there costing large amounts of money.
yeah because killing the leader of a nation and leaving without even trying to install a government to fill the inevitable power vacuum is a better idea