Nickpb, child enthusiast/Child Predator, overall useless piece of stuff

[Khaz°]

She sent the picture though, it is partly her fault whether you want to accept that or not.Yeah it kinda does?  In our society it's pretty forgeted up to be loveually interacting with minors, I don't know what society you live in where this is okay.

depending on the age of consent, an incident between a 16 and an 18 year old is nothing too serious.

it can be wrong legally, but morally a 2 year age difference is not a big deal

[Ad Bot]

[Foxscotch]

how the forget do you expect me to believe you

you will never believe it. it's not even about evidence, because people have explained several times that it's not only unreasonable to expect anyone to have evidence of it at all, and people have explained several times how this potential "evidence" wouldn't even prove anything
you just don't like nick. which, honestly, I find reasonable. but you're trying to justify it by saying you think he's a child enthusiast

She sent the picture though, it is partly her fault whether you want to accept that or not.

hmm. it isn't her fault whether you want to accept that or not

Yeah it kinda does?  In our society it's pretty forgeted up to be loveually interacting with minors, I don't know what society you live in where this is okay.

like I said, gay love used to be illegal. legality doesn't determine morality. it's bad to loveually abuse kids, but a 16 year old isn't a kid. even legally, that's the age of consent in a LOT of places. just because there's some federal law against it doesn't mean it's wrong to share pictures when you're at an age where you could have actual love with the person

[McJob]

I leave for 4 hours and now I'm completely out of the loop :(

[kahnuu]

depending on the age of consent, an incident between a 16 and an 18 year old is nothing too serious.

it can be wrong legally, but morally a 2 year age difference is not a big deal

what about a 15 and 20 year old

[Electrk.]

what about a 15 and 20 year old

I don't see a problem with it ;)

[Tezuni 2.0]

I think Kahnuu has established a deliberate lack of reading comprehension for the purposes of trolling, so I encourage ya'll not to engage him any further.

That said, I need to correct Bubbagum some others here. Nick screenshot'd that picture obviously, but didn't go around actively distributing it. In 2013 Tenshi and Nick were friends, but that quickly dissolved. I was in the skype call when Tenshi used teamviewer to rip bubbagum's photo, mirror it, and post it to the blockland forum. Despite my protests it was Tenshi who publicly posted that photo right here on the forums.

[Khaz°]

what about a 15 and 20 year old

that would be wrong both legally and morally

[Drydess]

I realize I'm pretty late to the party, and I only read the first ten pages.
Even though sending nudes over the internet may seem weird to some people, and are having that influence their opinion of nick and the whole drama, but to others it's normal. Nick may be an ass, but it was not his fault whatsoever that he sent research to a minor. She lied about her age, which he had no way of proving apart from her word. So he did what he thought was normal, and she consented. Again, nick is a richard at times, but definitely not a child enthusiast.

[Mr. Bones]

you will never believe it. it's not even about evidence, because people have explained several times that it's not only unreasonable to expect anyone to have evidence of it at all, and people have explained several times how this potential "evidence" wouldn't even prove anything
you just don't like nick. which, honestly, I find reasonable. but you're trying to justify it by saying you think he's a child enthusiasthmm. it isn't her fault whether you want to accept that or notlike I said, gay love used to be illegal. legality doesn't determine morality. it's bad to loveually abuse kids, but a 16 year old isn't a kid. even legally, that's the age of consent in a LOT of places. just because there's some federal law against it doesn't mean it's wrong to share pictures when you're at an age where you could have actual love with the person

Yes, it is partly her fault.  She had a choice to make here, knowing that once that picture was sent nick could do whatever he want with it.  If she didn't determine this at the time it isn't my problem, but she's still at fault.

You think love is morally okay if you're at an age where it's possible?  Seriously?  I mean, I guess it's okay to be taking pictures of nude 12 year old boys and girls because most of them can technically have love around this age.  Why are you using gay love as an brown townogy?  You said yourself, it USED to be illegal.  The public decided it's okay to do this sorta thing.  Society generally must not like underage pictures though, hence it's illegal.  Because a lot of people clearly think it's not okay?

depending on the age of consent, an incident between a 16 and an 18 year old is nothing too serious.

it can be wrong legally, but morally a 2 year age difference is not a big deal

Not everyone agrees with your morals.  I can accept your morals, but can you accept mine?

[Tezuni 2.0]

Yeah no, there's been nothing 'researchographic' in either of these two cases.

[Khaz°]

Not everyone agrees with your morals.  I can accept your morals, but can you accept mine?

of course

[Foxscotch]

You think love is morally okay if you're at an age where it's possible?  Seriously?  I mean, I guess it's okay to be taking pictures of nude 12 year old boys and girls because most of them can technically have love around this age.

man somebody can't frickin read huh. that's gotta suck

[Mr. Bones]

it's bad to loveually abuse kids, but a 16 year old isn't a kid. even legally, that's the age of consent in a LOT of places.

Can you clarify what you meant here?  Re-reading, it seems like you're saying it wouldn't be loveually abusing a kid even though it literally is.  Is this actually your point?

[Mr. Bones]

man somebody can't frickin read huh. that's gotta suck

You can actually have love at 16 you said.  You can also actually have love a little younger than that too, so following what you said it's okay to have love at ages where it's possible.  I'm not misconstruing this, this is literally what you said.  You either don't know how to construct thoughts into a post, or you're in damage control mode.

[Foxscotch]

Can you clarify what you meant here?  Re-reading, it seems like you're saying it wouldn't be loveually abusing a kid even though it literally is.  Is this actually your point?

I'm saying it is LEGAL for a 16 year old to have love with an 18 year old, in several US states. and that it is therefore stupid that those same two people couldn't LEGALLY share nudes, despite being able to LEGALLY have love