Disagree with me if you want since everyone is allowed their own opinion, but I personally think it is unfair that this RP seems to be one sided. Hear me out (even though I know the people I use in my example will disagree with me), but how is it fair that Kyrev is allowed to be almost five stars in everything, then get mad when Conservatia is 10 years ahead in tech and get it taken away from Conservatia? How is it fair that basically only Imperialist nations win in these types of RPs? Basically, if you work on trying to expand your nation peacefully and work on developing your nation, other nations will attack you regardless of the length of time your nation has been here. IC is IC, but he wasn't expanding into your territory, he was expanding into your "sphere of influence" which is basically saying, "i own this land but not officially ;)))" Look, all is fair in love in war, but I just don't think it is fair that certain nations get five stars right out of the gate, get other nation's abilities taken away, and how Imperialism is the only way to win (which im sure someone is already replying to me about how its not and how im handicapped, which i disagree with but i wont argue and turn this into a flamewar).
tl;dr - why does kyrev have five stars after five days and complain about conservatia being 10 years ahead in tech, and why is imperialism rewarded and paraded in these rps