i dont want to return but can someone explain to me why im perma-banned from this
does swat just want to try to make me appear as the ultimate bad guy or something
You were permabanned because in practice you had failed to handle things well. I gave you multiple reasons why you were made week IE by the defecit created by your military. And when you tried to appeal over steam, you either blocked me or went offline. It was shown that you weren't willing to talk about it. And the fact that you're still talking about it says that you still just want to get your way in the argument. It's not going to happen.
its not like washk mattered, it was weaker than a nation that didnt even exist
i made a single post about me quiting due to being ignored and regarded as a stuff-nation because beforehand i wasnt a major member of the forum games section
Again, I gave you the reasons prior, and you either glazed over them or ignored them entirely. In the case of the supra-sovereign state post, I answered you twice, and you didn't so much as acknowledge the posts. So here I am throwing up my arms saying, "I did what you asked." You were also ignored at times because I have a life and things to do, so you were ignored like everyone else, and you know what, I am hard on everyone just like I was to you. Did you expect some special treatment? I don't get it. What do you even want or expect to gain by pulling this up again, huh?
Also, although it wasn't my concern, nor does it matter to someone playing a moderator role, you claimed a majority of the arable land in the region and then threw it away over a petty problem that you could have solved yourself. Here are many people doing their best to navigate the RP and you just gave up, so while as a moderator, it means little as far as managing the game, it's still a distasteful, discourteous and ungrateful thing to do.
So please, I am asking you not to post here again. Not for your sake or mine, but for the people still playing and trying to enjoy the game.
END OF A stuffty because everyone was against the king or w/e REVOLUTION
A hostile Parliament has executed the King and dissolved the position of Monarch! The head of the Anglish church, a religion that hasn't ever been required, but apparently is now being forced upon the people* (i mean, this entire rebellion is because of religion and king overreach, and now the religious people are in power because 93% of parliament approves. so i'm assuming swat is saying we are now a theocratic constitutional republic, one motivated by religion. i mean, i think this would piss people off more than anything. we never forced the norse religion on anyone for a reason), is now the Archbishop of Bremerhaven!
Anglond is now a constitutional republic, one holding to the key figures of patriotism for a country, over allegiance to a head of state, and personal liberty. Considering I am now 93% of parliament and represent the angered people, I must say the nation is probably pretty stable. (??)
this was totally the plan all along.
*Just want to point out that ALL and parliament was more or less fighting for the preservation of their culture. It wasn't that they wanted to impose religion. I would presume that IRL you believe in democratic values, right? Well what if the highest executive power in the land in which you live said "All of you must obey and forfeit your rights," but also be implying on a theological level that they are greater than God and that the bible can be followed loosely to the point of rejecting fundamental truths. The legislative body is rejected as a governing body, and the people's rights are thrown out. Wouldn't you be upset if your world was turned on its head?
Will have agricultural maps out soon.
Poll