the real thing i'm concerned about is that they literally avoided consulting the CBO about this? like please correct me if i'm wrong about that, but it does strike me as odd that they would decide to forego a professional, nonpartisan, thorough look into the effects of the bill before even debating or passing it, conveniently after their last attempt was brown townyzed to be Pretty Bad™ by the CBO, and obvs that drew a lot of negative attention. the fact is, if people can't afford to keep themselves healthy, they will die, and i don't think that's something we should have to wait and see about. we have a right to know the potential effects of this bill before it's passed into law and healthcare is yanked away from people
and the whole thing of counting rape, loveual assault, having children, etc. as pre-existing conditions is really disconcerting. if anyone can explain that one to me then please do so, because as far as i can tell it benefits no one but rapists, and i'd really like to have a better idea as to what the deal there is. i really don't think those things would be there on purpose, so is it just an unfortunate coincidence?