verifiable journalistic standards
You realize this is just code-word for Liberal Certified™ source right? Anything I throw at you that isn't Liberal Certified™ is just going to be dismissed as tribal or sensible or whatever the new buzzword is this week.
I had a whole argument about why comparing 5 seconds to 3 hours is loving idiotic but you didn't retort any of it.
AKA you wasted your time because you don't posses basic contextual language skills. Do you seriously think writing an argument explaining how 3 hours is longer than 5 seconds is a better use of your time than watching an informational video about Hillary Clinton? Every time someone in this thread says "this is why it's plausible that Hillary Clinton murdered people throughout her campaign", you respond with "That's not enough evidence". So somebody comes in and gives you
3 HOURS of evidence and you come back with "Woah man that's too much! Turn it down a little". See the pattern? You've set up an argument that only you can win. Typical liberal tactic.
You're probably a wagecuck who unironically believes his time is worth money. As a matter of fact you're probably doing this subconsciously because it's how you've been conditioned.
I suppose Rally should go in the same category as beachbum and Lord Tony, i.e. "do not interact".
Am I seriously on a global trigger warning list now? Man, you guys are so effective at pushing the liberal agenda it's amazing. You literally don't even know you're doing it.
Poll