The infograph was part of the "why is your attention span so loving low" joke,
you dont get to post an actual argument with rhetoric and then claim it wasnt meant to be taken seriously once someone refutes it. forget off
I linked to videos that people refused to look at and instead want to start cracking Humble Water Filter Merchant jokes, so really it's whatever at this point
Now I know what Lisa Tepes felt like
As Seventh already said, if the videos were so damning they'd have very incriminating pieces/chains of evidence that could lead you to conclude that there was DNC involvement without requiring some kind of leap of faith from the viewer. If any such "smoking gun" evidence existed you'd be able to type it out with little effort. But that evidence doesn't exist, leaving a combined 3 hours of circumstantial bullstuff in video form. I'm not going to waste my time ingesting that for all the reasons Seventh mentioned. I don't link the entirety of Karl Marx's
Capital whenever someone says communism is bad.
So but your post took more than 5 seconds to read, so as far as I'm concerned it doesn't exist. Try again.
Here is my list of certified sources, I refuse to take anything else seriously for a various amount of cop out reasons:
- cnn
- Breitbart
- Drudge Report
You can't make a meaningful distinction between reading my direct reply to his rhetoric for at most two minutes and putting aside three hours of your day
for essentially no reason? If I'm arguing with Deus Ex, he should be able to give me his reasons for why he thinks I'm wrong, he shouldn't get to avoid responsibility for his stance by linking me to other peoples' treatises if he's going to call me a dumbass for not believing the stuff he's saying in the first place.
I'm not ready to have this discourse
hey guys you should check ted cruz's twitter likes real quick
This is actually realedit: I removed the link (it was just a link to ted cruz's list of likes on twitter) cause I'm not sure if it counts as breaking any rules
Poll