Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 2848184 times)

Yeah let's just monitor all Muslims because a tiny minority does bad things

See, you've given me a sarcastic response that doesn't really answer any questions. That doesn't help anybody.

I'd much rather keep an eye on suspicious people rather than every loving person who believes in Allah

I'd much rather keep an eye on suspicious people rather than every loving person who believes in Allah
i bet he'll respond with something along the lines of "muslims are suspicious"

really? in what contexts?
from what i recall, they have a punishment where they enslave three generations of a criminal, whatever those generations may be

guilt by association

i bet he'll respond with something along the lines of "muslims are suspicious"
Yeah probably

I'd much rather keep an eye on suspicious people rather than every loving person who believes in Allah

The problem here is that you can't immediately tell who is suspicious right off the bat. If there were a way, that'd be great and I'd support that instead of monitoring every Muslim.

The thing is that the biggest connection between a terrorist and the average Muslim is the fact that they're Muslim. When you have attacks coming from this group of people, you should start considering monitoring that group of people to see what's going on.

i bet he'll respond with something along the lines of "muslims are suspicious"
Yeah probably

well when tons of terrorist attacks come from this group, yeah the group becomes suspicious. am i incorrect?

from what i recall, they have a punishment where they enslave three generations of a criminal, whatever those generations may be

guilt by association

well you wouldn't exactly be guilty by association if Annoying Orange is proposing what I think he's proposing. Like I said earlier, close family members of terrorists could be used as tokens.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2016, 05:21:22 PM by Frequency »

Like I said earlier, close family members of terrorists could be used as tokens.
what are tokens?

what are tokens?

You'll have to excuse me. A more accurate term would be "bargaining chips."

"Innocent until proven guilty" isn't partial to religion. Keep in mind just how many Muslims there are, too. It's one of the largest people groups in the world. When someone does something bad, then it's a good chance they could end up being a Muslim as a direct result of that. I don't see anyone suggesting we monitor all young white American males because they MIGHT shoot up a school.

You'll have to excuse me. A more accurate term would be "bargaining chips."
They're human beings you dip


we should have a queen instead -_-

I know, it's a shame.
a'ight there's legitimately something wrong with you if you actually believe that

First, you could never monitor every single loving Muslim in the US

Second, your average every-day Muslim and Radical Muslim are quite different. You know how? Terrorists are willing to die for their beliefs, they are willing to kill for their beliefs, and they are willing to destroy anything for their beliefs.

Most Muslims disagree & hate the dipstuffs in the Middle East blowing stuff up and killing people, so what makes you think that they'd turn around and do the same thing they so loudly denounce?

he isn't going to make muslims wear badges. he never said that.