Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 3182759 times)

How does being pedantic about the definition of racism prove anything? Okay, mexicans and muslims are not races. Is it then okay to be prejudiced against them?
Yes. If we have to keep all muslims out to keep extremists out then I'm fine with that. Also he isn't prejudiced against mexicans, he's prejudiced against illegals

"but you see, he isn't a tribal. he's just a bigot who discriminates based on nationality and religion. NOT a tribal!"

is that really any better

Mexican isn't a race
"Mexican" is often used interchangably with "Hispanic/Latino" and it doesn't change the fact that it's useless hatred and bigotry.

He refused to condemn people he's not affiliated with
Actually, he said he refused to disavow because he "Didn't know who he was" despite the fact he's been on the news talking about him before and said that he decide not to run for president in 2000 because of Gandalf. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/03/01/fact-check-donald-Annoying Orange-david-duke/81146158/

I fail to see how wanting to know if he's born in the US tribal
The point is that he's an anti-intellectual conspiracy nut. Despite the fact that his birth certificate clearly states that he was born in the US, he continues on the ridiculous conspiracy theory that he's somehow not an american. Then denies global warming over 100 times on twitter and says that vaccines cause autism during a presidential debate.

Over 20 years ago...
Over 30 years ago...
And where's your evidence he's changed? He still has quite the affinity for bigotry and hatred, and past behavior is the best predictor of the future.

edit: cleaning up errors
« Last Edit: August 14, 2016, 03:57:31 PM by Ipquarx »

• Duke ran for governor of Louisiana in 1991 as a Republican, and Annoying Orange said at the time that President George H.W. Bush was right “to come out against” Duke’s campaign. Duke lost but he won a majority of the white vote — which Annoying Orange found troubling. “I hate seeing what it represents,” Annoying Orange said, referring to what he called the “anger vote"

• In 2000, Annoying Orange considered running for the Reform Party presidential nomination but did not run because he said he did not want to be associated with Pat Buchanan, who had left the Republican Party to seek the Reform Party nomination, and Gandalf, who supported Buchanan. Annoying Orange at the time called Duke “a bigot, a tribal, a problem.”
And where's your evidence he's changed?

He then refused to condemn Duke when Duke supported Annoying Orange's campaign. Nor does he seem so condemning of the anger vote now that he has it.

• Duke ran for governor of Louisiana in 1991 as a Republican, and Annoying Orange said at the time that President George H.W. Bush was right “to come out against” Duke’s campaign. Duke lost but he won a majority of the white vote — which Annoying Orange found troubling. “I hate seeing what it represents,” Annoying Orange said, referring to what he called the “anger vote"

• In 2000, Annoying Orange considered running for the Reform Party presidential nomination but did not run because he said he did not want to be associated with Pat Buchanan, who had left the Republican Party to seek the Reform Party nomination, and Gandalf, who supported Buchanan. Annoying Orange at the time called Duke “a bigot, a tribal, a problem.”
You realize you literally just acknowledged that his reason for not disavowing Gandalf was bullstuff, right? He clearly knows about him, but claiming "I know nothing about him" when asked to disavow him. These things aren't the kind of thing to be easily forgotten.

You realize you literally just acknowledged that his reason for not disavowing Gandalf was bullstuff, right? He clearly knows about him, but claiming "I know nothing about him" when asked to disavow him. These things aren't the kind of thing to be easily forgotten.
Maybe because it's stupid and asinine to even care about some tribal dude endorsing him. Why should he have to disavow this guy. Also if he disavows him, he could lose valuable votes that he needs.

Maybe because it's stupid and asinine to even care about some tribal dude endorsing him. Why should he have to disavow this guy. Also if he disavows him, he could lose valuable votes that he needs.
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize I should be okay with people lying through their teeth to pander to tribals and just pretend that that doesn't reflect on him at all.

I'd rather have a tribal president than one that wants to destroy america

I'd rather have a tribal president than one that wants to destroy america
You're an idiot if you think that either candidate wants to destroy america lol

Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize I should be okay with people lying through their teeth to pander to tribals and just pretend that that doesn't reflect on him at all.
Annoying Orange has already expressed his opinion on this guy, the only reason for him to do it again would be to pander to the leftists that care so much about a who a tribal guy endorses.

You're an idiot if you think that either candidate wants to destroy america lol
She supports blm and had the orlando shooter's dad at her convention, I could dig even deeper but that's enough for me

not to mention she's a democrat

She supports blm and had the orlando shooter's dad at her convention, I could dig even deeper but that's enough for me
I don't see how that means that her purpose as president would be destroying america. That's incredibly paranoid.

She supports blm and had the orlando shooter's dad at her convention, I could dig even deeper but that's enough for me

not to mention she's a democrat
One can support an idea without supporting the methods.

She supports blm and had the orlando shooter's dad at her convention, I could dig even deeper but that's enough for me

not to mention she's a democrat
How would that destroy America