Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 2890914 times)

If you wanna talk about an indefinite ban, then we'll talk, but this is just for 90 days. That's completely useless. If anyone is actually planning a terrorist attack literally all they have to do is wait 3 months.

Okay? It's a temporary ban so nothing happens while the US is deciding on a more concrete permanent position.

you're gonna need a different source than the daily garbage or else drop that point.


"waaah ur source is biased"

Oh forget off Nonnel. It's clear you never read the article in the first place, the numbers are from Eurostat.

the government i help fund?

Don't kid yourself we both know you don't pay taxes.

Wouldn't it be grand if the US went isolationist again?

Okay? It's a temporary ban so nothing happens while the US is deciding on a more concrete permanent position.
So we agree that the ban as it stands is useless, good. Now, how do you know that there is literally any plans in the works whatsoever to make an indefinite ban?

"waaah ur source is biased"

Oh forget off Nonnel. It's clear you never read the article in the first place, the numbers are from Eurostat.
so cite Eurostat and not a tabloid?

Don't kid yourself we both know you don't pay taxes.
nice meme

he didn't explicitly on-the-record say "i apologize for that" but horton hears a who and the sneetches were evidence that he'd changed his views. as well as, y'know, the political comics i just showed. he wouldn't write and push views he didn't have.

Yeah and Annoying Orange said he loves hispanics on Facebook so there's no way he could be doing that just to look better in the public eye

Yeah and Annoying Orange said he loves hispanics on Facebook so there's no way he could be doing that just to look better in the public eye
he wasn't running for office, though. he was posting his --at the time controversial-- opinions in the newspaper

--at the time

Yeah and your comics you posted were made --at the time-- that he was a tribal lol so you're posting political cartoons made by a person who was, --at the time--, a tribal. So what does that say about the cartoons?

I mean I love green eggs and ham just as much as the next guy, respek on his name

So we agree that the ban as it stands is useless, good.

Thats not what I said. The ban is a temporary solution while they work out a more permanent one

Now, how do you know that there is literally any plans in the works whatsoever to make an indefinite ban?

Again, not what I said. A permanent solution could be loving anything, it could be nuking the entire middle east an annexing Canada.


so cite Eurostat and not a tabloid?

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-press-releases/-/3-18092015-BP Maybe next time google it yourself and don't waste my time
« Last Edit: February 06, 2017, 12:02:09 AM by beachbum111111 »

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-press-releases/-/3-18092015-BP Maybe next time google it yourself and don't waste my time
well you've wasted my time



this is saying that 80% of the migrants are NOT syrian as seen here:



and not that 80% are economic migrants. so it's clear you didn't read the actual stats. for the love of god, just stop reading the daily mail.

well you've wasted my time

this is saying that 80% of the migrants are NOT syrian as seen here:

and not that 80% are economic migrants. so it's clear you didn't read the actual stats. for the love of god, just stop reading the daily mail.

Oops I guess I got the economic migrants and syrian refugee numbers mixed up, it's 3/5 not 4

Although the number can be as high as 95% http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2015/09/economist-explains-4
« Last Edit: February 06, 2017, 12:08:12 AM by beachbum111111 »

Thats not what I said. The ban is a temporary solution while they work out a more permanent one
It's disingenuous to call it a solution. It's not actually banning the dangerous countries. And again, you know there's going to be a permanent one how? There have been no plans released or any talk of a permanent ban. Only the temporary ban. It would be entirely plausible that the administration would just flat out drop it because of all the legal hassle. And now they have even less time to come up with an indefinite solution because of said legal hassle.

i agree that most of the people other than the syrians and iraqis, and maybe turkish and palestinian people as well as some north africans, are only taking advantage of the refugee crCIA. that's not to say they should all be sent back where they came, though.

Yeah and your comics you posted were made --at the time-- that he was a tribal lol so you're posting political cartoons made by a person who was, --at the time--, a tribal. So what does that say about the cartoons?
also i missed this before but
..?

And again, you know there's going to be a permanent one how? There have been no plans released or any talk of a permanent ban.

Holy stuff are you legitimately handicapped?

Thats not what I said. The ban is a temporary solution while they work out a more permanent one

'permanent one' referring to solution, NOT ban

Again
A permanent solution could be loving anything, it could be nuking the entire middle east an annexing Canada.

It would be entirely plausible that the administration would just flat out drop it because of all the legal hassle. And now they have even less time to come up with an indefinite solution because of said legal hassle.

Annoying Orange has explained in the past that he wanted a ban until the countries representatives figured out a better solution, and he then repeated it back in December after he was elected.

Holy stuff are you legitimately handicapped?

When you've got nothing else left

tbf i'm not sure how iran is committing terrorism on american soil by sending university students and educators here