POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD

[beachbum111111]

Why

Because you don't hate Annoying Orange or something

[Ad Bot]

[LeisureSuit912]

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38927175

Travel ban won't be reinstated

"We're gonna win so much you're gonna get tired of winning."

[HooperScooper]

my dad is a Annoying Orange supporter

777 pages just to let ya know

[Ipquarx]

They might take it up to the supreme court, but only if they can get an appeal i guess??? i'm not really sure how the court system in the US works.

[Red Spy]

i'm not really sure how the court system in the US works.

We have an dog that stuffs in a basket with yes or no stamped on it

[beachbum111111]

We have an dog that stuffs in a basket with yes or no stamped on it

Oh so same as Canada

[Frequency]

lol @ all the "no" answers in the poll when the Constitution literally says the President has the power and it's been done by other presidents before

[Ipquarx]

lol @ all the "no" answers in the poll when the Constitution literally says the President has the power and it's been done by other presidents before

Wow i didn't know you were a legal expert

[Foxscotch]

Wow i didn't know you were a legal expert

yea what the forget do judges know........

[beachbum111111]

Wow i didn't know you were a legal expert

Are you?

[otto-san]

lol @ all the "no" answers in the poll when the Constitution literally says the President has the power and it's been done by other presidents before

i voted no because currently a federal court has determined that its legality is questionable enough to put it on hold, and the next highest court has agreed with them

[Nonnel]

We have an dog that stuffs in a basket with yes or no stamped on it

Oh so same as Canada

That is Canada you're thinking of. They hire the groundhog to see its shadow or not for yes/no, respectively.

[extremely extreme]

I don't know why this is still up for debate, it's 100% legal.

"(f) Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."

https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-2006/0-0-0-2364.html

[otto-san]

I don't know why this is still up for debate, it's 100% legal.
https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-2006/0-0-0-2364.html

i haven't looked too into the details, but this amendment to that act may invalidate that here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-79/pdf/STATUTE-79-Pg911.pdf

unsure if any court cases in the past since this amendment would have clarified this

the original 1952 act seemed to exist partially or largely to allow exclusion based on nationality, and this amendment sought to make that practice illegal, so i would expect that it would no longer be that simple

edit: completely unsure if the act you linked came before or after this tho, tryin to figure that out rn

edit again: https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/act.html
seems to still be in effect considering it isn't listed as "repealed" here. i'm assuming logistically there should definitely be restrictions on the president's powers under that provision but the courts would have to be the ones to establish that

[LeisureSuit912]

Glad to see all the legal experts on BLF at work